Application of quantitative pharmacology analysis to support early clinical development of oncology drugs: dose selection

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Ningyuan [1 ]
Li, Yu [1 ]
Cui, Wenbin [1 ]
Yu, Xiangqing [1 ]
Huang, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Hansoh Pharmaceut Grp, 287 Xiangke Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Early clinical development; dose selection; quantitative pharmacology; quantitative system pharmacology; oncology drug; THERAPEUTICS;
D O I
10.1080/00498254.2024.2377577
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The selection of appropriate starting dose and suitable method to predict an efficacious dose for novel oncology drug in the early clinical development stage poses significant challenges. The traditional methods of using body surface area transformation from toxicology studies to predict the first-in human (FIH) starting dose, or simply selecting the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) as efficacious dose or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), are usually inadequate and risky for novel oncology drugs.Due to the regulatory efforts aimed at improving dose optimisation in oncology drug development, clinical dose selection is now shifting away from these traditional methods towards a comprehensive benefit/risk assessment-based approach. Quantitative pharmacology analysis (QPA) plays a crucial role in this new paradigm. This mini-review summarises the use of QPA in selecting the starting dose for oncology FIH studies and potential efficacious doses for expansion or phase 2 trials. QPA allows for a more rational and scientifically based approach to dose selection by integrating information across studies and development phases.In conclusion, the application of QPA in oncology drug development has the potential to significantly enhance the success rates of clinical trials and ultimately support clinical decision-making, particularly in dose selection.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 423
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utility and impact of quantitative pharmacology on dose selection and clinical development of immuno-oncology therapy
    Ji, Yan
    Sy, Sherwin K. B.
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 93 (04) : 273 - 293
  • [2] Utility and impact of quantitative pharmacology on dose selection and clinical development of immuno-oncology therapy
    Yan Ji
    Sherwin K. B. Sy
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2024, 93 : 273 - 293
  • [3] Mechanistic Quantitative Pharmacology Strategies for the Early Clinical Development of Bispecific Antibodies in Oncology
    Betts, Alison
    van der Graaf, Piet H.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 108 (03) : 528 - 541
  • [4] Development of a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) Platform to Support Translational Research and Clinical Development in Immuno-Oncology
    Schmidt, Brian J.
    Bartlett, Derek W.
    Agrawal, Shruti
    Reed, Michael
    Jure-Kunkel, Maria
    Gutierrez, Andres A.
    Clynes, Raphael A.
    Fischer, Bruce S.
    Surywanshi, Satyendra
    Kadambi, Ananth
    Friedrich, Christina
    Kudrycki, Katherine
    Roy, Amit
    Leil, Tarek A.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2015, 42 : S22 - S23
  • [5] The Role of Clinical Pharmacology in Oncology Dose Selection: Advances and Opportunities in Personalized Medicine
    Shord, Stacy S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 57 (10): : S99 - S104
  • [6] Cancer drugs clinical pharmacology: Relevance in oncology
    Beijnen, JH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 1 - 1
  • [7] Clinical pharmacology of anti-angiogenic drugs in oncology
    Gougis, P.
    Wassermann, J.
    Spano, J. P.
    Keynan, N.
    Funck-Brentano, C.
    Salem, J. E.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 119 : 75 - 93
  • [8] Use of quantitative clinical pharmacology to improve early clinical development success in neurodegenerative diseases
    Geerts, Hugo
    Gieschke, Ronald
    Peck, Richard
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 11 (08) : 789 - 795
  • [10] Drugs for Diabetes: From Pharmacology to Clinical Application
    Srivastava, Swayam Prakash
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2023, 16 (10)