Controlled drainage with subirrigation systems: Reduce water supply by automatic control

被引:0
|
作者
de Wit, J. A. [1 ,2 ]
van Dam, J. C. [2 ]
van den Eertwegh, G. A. P. H. [3 ]
van Huijgevoort, M. H. J. [1 ,4 ]
Ritsema, C. J. [2 ]
Bartholomeus, R. P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KWR Water Res Inst, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Soil Phys & Land Management, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] KnowH2O, Berg En Dal, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Tile drainage; Drought; Freshwater availability; SWAP; Water management; TABLE MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; MODEL; CORN; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109022
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Controlled drainage with subirrigation (CDSI) is a viable measure to supply, retain or discharge groundwater, thereby contributing to freshwater availability in agriculture under changing environmental conditions. Relatively simple CDSI systems can be controlled manually to set a few drainage levels. More advanced systems can be controlled remotely to set any drainage level (between a technical maximum and minimum). CDSI potentially improves hydrological conditions for crop growth, but the required external water supply can be large. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to investigate whether external water supply for subirrigation can be reduced by automatic control of CDSI systems in relation to crop water demand. Field measurements of a CDSI pilot in the Dutch sandy Pleistocene uplands were combined with weather forecasts to simulate the optimal drainage level and day by day water demand and supply using the agro-hydrological Soil, Water, Atmosphere, Plant model (SWAP). Firstly, model simulations showed that the water requirement reduced by 60 mm (dry growing season), 253 mm (average growing season) and 348 mm (wet growing season) using a dynamically managed crest level (CDSI-dyn) compared to using a fixed crest level (CDSI-fix), with minor effects on crop yield. Secondly, model simulations showed that a higher hydraulic resistance to downward seepage, a higher ditch water level or deeper roots reduced the water supply (up to 100 mm). Thirdly, accepting 10 % daily crop drought and oxygen stress for CDSI-dyn reduced the water supply requirement with 235-628 mm (dry vs wet growing season) compared to CDSI-fix. In conclusion, the required water volume for CDSI could be substantially reduced by automated control of the drainage level and water supply rate, while maintaining crop yield or accepting minor reductions, which increases the potential of implementation of CDSI systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of controlled drainage/subirrigation on tomato yield and water quality
    Tan, CS
    Drury, CF
    Soultani, M
    Gaynor, JD
    Welacky, TW
    van Wesenbeeck, IJ
    Ng, HYF
    [J]. SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IRRIGATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, (449): : 327 - 333
  • [2] Controlled drainage and subirrigation effects on crop yields and water quality
    Tan, CS
    Drury, CF
    Soultani, M
    van Wesenbeeck, IJ
    Ng, HYF
    Gaynor, JD
    Welacky, TW
    [J]. DRAINAGE IN THE 21ST CENTURY: FOOD PRODUCTION AND THE ENVIRONMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL DRAINAGE SYMPOSIUM, 1998, : 676 - 683
  • [3] Hydrological consequences of controlled drainage with subirrigation
    de Wit, Janine A.
    van Huijgevoort, Marjolein H. J.
    van Dam, Jos C.
    van den Eertwegh, Ge A. P. H.
    van Deijl, Dion
    Ritsema, Coen J.
    Bartholomeus, Ruud P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 628
  • [4] Impact of Controlled Drainage and Subirrigation on Water Quality in the Red River Valley
    Almen, Kristen
    Jia, Xinhua
    DeSutter, Thomas
    Scherer, Thomas
    Lin, Minglian
    [J]. WATER, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 16
  • [5] SIMULATED FEEDBACK-OPERATION OF CONTROLLED-DRAINAGE SUBIRRIGATION SYSTEMS
    FOUSS, JL
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1985, 28 (03): : 839 - 847
  • [6] Controlled drainage and subirrigation - A water management option to reduce non-point source pollution from agricultural land
    Wesstrom, Ingrid
    Joel, Abraham
    Messing, Ingmar
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 198 : 74 - 82
  • [7] Recycling runoff and drainage water in the Midwest (Wetland Reservoir Subirrigation Systems - WRSIS)
    Allred, BJ
    Fausey, NP
    Clevenger, WB
    Brown, LC
    [J]. TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL): ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 191 - 191
  • [8] CONTROLLED-DRAINAGE SUBIRRIGATION SYSTEM AUTOMATION BASED ON SOIL-WATER POTENTIAL
    JOHNSON, MH
    THOMAS, DL
    MCLENDON, BD
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1993, 36 (03): : 751 - 759
  • [9] A FLUCTUATING WATER-TABLE MODEL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF A CONTROLLED-DRAINAGE SUBIRRIGATION SYSTEM
    BENGTSON, RL
    GARZON, RS
    FOUSS, JL
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1993, 36 (02): : 437 - 443
  • [10] CONTROLLED-DRAINAGE SUBIRRIGATION SIMULATION FOR A CLAYPAN SOIL
    MOSTAGHIMI, S
    LEMBKE, WD
    BOAST, CW
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1985, 28 (05): : 1557 - 1563