The Importance of Well-Being Education for Nurse Preceptors

Purpose: To investigate the difference between the segmented axial length (AL) and the composite AL on a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and to evaluate the subsequent effects on artificial intelligence intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations: the Kane and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas compared with established vergence formulas. Setting: National Hospital Organization, Tokyo Medical Center,Japan. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery witha single-piece IOL were reviewed. The prediction accuracy of theBarrett Universal II, Haigis, Hill-RBF 3.0, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Kane,and SRK/T formulas based on 2 ALs were compared for eachformula. The heteroscedastic test was used with the SD of pre-diction errors as the endpoint for formula performance. Results: The study included 145 eyes of 145 patients. The segmented AL (24.83 +/- 1.89) was significantly shorter than the composite AL (24.88 +/- 1.96,P< .001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a negative proportional bias for the differences between the segmented AL and the composite AL. The SD values obtained by Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas based on the segmented AL (0.52 diopters [D], 0.54 D, and 0.50 D, respectively)were significantly lower than those based on the composite AL(0.57 D, 0.60 D, and 0.52 D, respectively, P< .01). Conclusions: The segmented ALs were longer in short eyes and shorter in long eyes than the composite ALs. The refractive accuracy can be improved in the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas by changing the composite ALs to the segmented ALs.