Probabilistic Data-Driven Modeling of a Melt Pool in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing

被引:0
|
作者
Fang, Qihang [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Gang [3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Meihua [1 ,2 ]
Tamir, Tariku Sinshaw [5 ,6 ]
Shen, Zhen [3 ,4 ]
Yan, Chao-Bo [7 ,8 ]
Wang, Fei-Yue [9 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Automat, State Key Lab Multimodal Artificial Intelligence S, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Automat, Beijing Engn Res Ctr Intelligent Syst & Technol, State Key Lab Multimodal Artificial Intelligence S, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangdong Engn Res Ctr Printing & Intelligent Mfg, Cloud Comp Ctr, Dongguan 523808, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Univ Technol, State Key Lab Precis Elect Mfg Technol & Equipment, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Debre Markos Univ, Inst Technol, Debre Markos 269, Ethiopia
[7] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Fac Elect & Informat Engn, State Key Lab Mfg Syst Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[8] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Fac Elect & Informat Engn, Sch Automat Sci & Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[9] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Automat, State Key Lab Management & Control Complex Syst, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF); additive manufacturing; melt pool; uncertainty quantification; quality control; process planning; anomaly detection;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2024.3412431
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The widespread adoption of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing is hampered by process unreliability problems. Modeling the melt pool behavior in LPBF is crucial to develop process control methods. While data-driven models linking melt pool dynamics to specific process parameters have shown appreciable advancements, existing models often oversimplify these relationships as deterministic, failing to account for the inherent instability of LPBF processes. Such simplifications can lead to overconfident and unreliable predictions, potentially resulting in erroneous process decisions. To address this critical issue, we propose a probabilistic data-driven approach to melt pool modeling that incorporates process noise and uncertainty. Our framework formulates a problem that includes distribution approximation and uncertainty quantification. Specifically, the Gaussian distribution with higher order priors, aided with variational inference and importance sampling, is used to approximate the probability distribution of melt pool characteristics. The uncertainty inherent in both LPBF process data and the modeling approach itself are then decomposed and approximated by using Monte Carlo sampling. The melt pool model is improved further by using a novel grid-based representation for the neighborhood of a fusion point, and a neural network architecture designed for effective feature fusion. This approach not only refines the accuracy of the model but also quantifies the uncertainty of the predictions, thereby enabling more informed decision-making with reduced risk. Two potential applications, including LPBF process planning and anomaly detection, are discussed. The implementation of our model is available at https://github.com/qihangGH/probabilistic_melt_pool_model. Note to Practitioners-Modeling the melt pool behavior in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) processes is pivotal for enhancing its quality control. However, a problem is that most existing data-driven melt pool models learn melt pool behavior with a deterministic function, which predicts the same outputs if its inputs are the same. This deviates from the reality and neglects the uncertainty in LPBF processes. As a consequence, the quality control methods based on such melt pool models lack required reliability. In response to these challenges, this work proposes to model melt pool behavior by using probability distributions with deep learning techniques, which can quantify the uncertainty in both LPBF process data and data-driven models. Aided with an elegantly designed representation for the neighborhood of a fusion point as model input, and a neural network architecture that fuses multi-modal data, the proposed model achieves accurate melt pool size prediction results. More importantly, this work quantifies and decomposes the prediction uncertainty. By accounting for noise and parameter variations, the probabilistic modeling models developed herein offer a more robust foundation for LPBF quality control than the existing ones. They can be readily applied by practitioners to perform improved process planning, defect prognosis, and real-time anomaly detection tasks.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hybrid Modeling Approach for Melt-Pool Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
    Moges, Tesfaye
    Yang, Zhuo
    Jones, Kevontrez
    Feng, Shaw
    Witherell, Paul
    Lu, Yan
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 21 (05)
  • [2] Multi phenomena melt pool sensor data fusion for enhanced process monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Gaikwad, Aniruddha
    Williams, Richard J.
    de Winton, Harry
    Bevans, Benjamin D.
    Smoqi, Ziyad
    Rao, Prahalada
    Hooper, Paul A.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2022, 221
  • [3] CAMERA-BASED COAXIAL MELT POOL MONITORING DATA REGISTRATION FOR LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Lu, Yan
    Yang, Zhuo
    Kim, Jaehyuk
    Cho, Hyunbo
    Yeung, Ho
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2020, VOL 2B, 2020,
  • [4] New hammerstein modeling and analysis for controlling melt pool width in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Wang, Dan
    Zhao, Xinyu
    Chen, Xu
    ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control, 2021, 1 (03):
  • [5] Data-driven characterization of thermal models for powder-bed-fusion additive manufacturing
    Yan, Wentao
    Lu, Yan
    Jones, Kevontrez
    Yang, Zhuo
    Fox, Jason
    Witherell, Paul
    Wagner, Gregory
    Liu, Wing Kam
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 36
  • [6] Particle scale modelling of powder recoating and melt pool dynamics in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: A review
    Li, Erlei
    Zhou, Zongyan
    Wang, Lin
    Zou, Ruiping
    Yu, Aibing
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 409
  • [7] Effect of laser focal point position on porosity and melt pool geometry in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Reijonen, Joni
    Revuelta, Alejandro
    Metsa-Kortelainen, Sini
    Salminen, Antti
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 85
  • [8] On the effect of shielding gas flow on porosity and melt pool geometry in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Reijonen, Joni
    Revuelta, Alejandro
    Riipinen, Tuomas
    Ruusuvuori, Kimmo
    Puukko, Pasi
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 32
  • [9] Deep learning-based data registration of melt-pool-monitoring images for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Kim, Jaehyuk
    Yang, Zhuo
    Ko, Hyunwoong
    Cho, Hyunbo
    Lu, Yan
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2023, 68 : 117 - 129
  • [10] Understanding Melt Pool Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
    Zhang, Zilong
    Zhang, Tianyu
    Sun, Can
    Karna, Sivaji
    Yuan, Lang
    MICROMACHINES, 2024, 15 (02)