Implementing strong sustainability in a design process

被引:0
|
作者
Cisternas, Melissa Escobar [1 ]
Faucheu, Jenny [2 ]
Troussier, Nadege [3 ]
Laforest, Valerie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon, Univ Jean Monnet, Univ Lumiere Lyon 2, Univ Lyon Jean Moulin 3,ENS Lyon,ENTPE,ENSA Lyon, F-42023 St Etienne, France
[2] Univ Lyon, Ctr SMS, CNRS, Mines St Etienne,UMR 5307 LGF, F-42023 St Etienne, France
[3] Arts & Metiers Inst Technol, Paris, France
来源
关键词
Strong sustainability framework; Operationalization; Design for strong sustainability methodology; ECONOMICS; PROPOSAL; SAFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100224
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The emergence of a post-growth era is expected that implies rethinking the production and consumption patterns with novel design models this forces higher educational institutions to reconsider their traditional ways of teaching sustainability in their curricula. Companies also need to overcome strategies that compartmentalize environment, society and economy in their industrial strategy in order to evolve in their support for the transition. The aim of this paper is to present a design process anchored in the Strong Sustainability paradigm to overcome the gap of how Strong Sustainability could be operationalised. Design Research Methodology (DRM) has been chosen as the supporting framework for the development of this project. The Design for Strong Sustainability (DfSoSy) methodology proposed, is built on three aspects of Strong Sustainability (Milieu, Regeneration, Safe and just operating space) successively applied in a sequenced iterative design process. The latter enable the integration of thought patterns associated with integrative, systemic and fractal or multi-scale thinking respectively. Moreover, the principle of sub-optimality is highlighted as a decision principle in SoSy. Results obtain has been validated as well on the pedagogical objectives as in the usefulness of the DfSoSy. The practical contribution of this study is the DfSoSy toolkit (c).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementing Sustainability Criteria in Product Innovations: a Human Process
    Verhulst, Elli
    Boks, Casper
    Masson, Henri
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION, 2009, : 549 - +
  • [2] Implementing Process Design Changes in Process Plants
    Connelly, D. E. G.
    [J]. TENTH MILL OPERATORS CONFERENCE 2009, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, (11): : 275 - 280
  • [3] Activating sustainability in the design process
    Miquel, Andrea
    [J]. i-com, 23 (03): : 335 - 351
  • [4] Design for Circular Economy in a Strong Sustainability Paradigm
    Rocha, Cristina Sousa
    Antunes, Paula
    Partidario, Paulo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [5] Tomorrow by design: a regional design process for sustainability
    McManus, P
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1998, 25 (04): : 634 - 635
  • [6] Process design meets sustainability: overview on the use of modelling tools for process design and sustainability assessment at Corbion
    Van Bochove, G.
    Cruz, L.
    Morao, A.
    Rugerio, C.
    [J]. 29TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT A, 2019, 46 : 115 - 120
  • [7] Design for X Tool to Introduce Sustainability in the Design Process
    Cappelletti F.
    Rossi M.
    Manuguerra L.
    Germani M.
    [J]. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 2023, 20 (02): : 234 - 247
  • [8] Key elements for implementing a strategic sustainability perspective in the product innovation process
    Hallstedt, Sophie I.
    Thompson, Anthony W.
    Lindahl, Pia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 51 : 277 - 288
  • [9] Implementing a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard to Contribute to the Process of Organisational Legitimacy Assessment
    Huang, Tairan
    Pepper, Matthew
    Bowrey, Graham
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN ACCOUNTING BUSINESS AND FINANCE JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (02) : 15 - 34
  • [10] Implementing sustainability in West Coast forests: CORE and FEMAT as experiments in process
    Rayner, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES, 1996, 31 (01): : 82 - 101