Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Preeclampsia Using the FullPIERS (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) Model in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Eastern India

被引:0
|
作者
Burman, Dipon [1 ]
Das, Sanjukta [2 ]
Burman, Jayeeta [3 ]
Sembiah, Sembagamuthu [4 ]
机构
[1] Balurghat Super Specialty Hosp, Obstet & Gynaecol, Balurghat, India
[2] Gangarampur Super Specialty Hosp, Obstet & Gynaecol, Gangarampur, India
[3] Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Govt Med Coll & Hosp, Community Med, Uluberia, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Community Med & Family Med, Kalyani, India
关键词
preeclampsia; fullpiers model; predictive tools; risk assessment; adverse maternal outcomes; pre-; eclampsia; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.66664
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Preeclampsia, characterized by hypertensive disorders and systemic inflammatory response, remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality globally. Effective risk assessment tools are crucial for predicting adverse maternal outcomes. Objective: This study evaluates the performance of the fullPIERS (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) model in predicting adverse maternal outcomes within 24 hours of admission for preeclampsia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over one year, involving 100 preeclamptic patients admitted to Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College & Hospital (NRSMCH). Predictor variables were collected within 24 hours of admission and analyzed using the fullPIERS model. Results: The fullPIERS model effectively stratified maternal risk. Adverse outcomes were significantly associated with systolic blood pressure (BP) >= 140 mmHg, diastolic BP >= 90 mmHg, oxygen saturation <= 95%, frontal headache, visual disturbances, chest pain/dyspnea, and abnormal random blood sugar, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, platelet count, and creatinine levels. A fullPIERS score >= 30 was strongly predictive of adverse maternal outcomes. Conclusion: The fullPIERS model is a valuable tool for predicting adverse maternal outcomes in preeclampsia, aiding in timely and effective clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] External validation of the fullPIERS (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) model
    Hadley, Emily E.
    Poole, Aaron
    Herrera, Sandra R.
    Bradley, Laura
    Dutta, Eryn
    Sukhavasi, Neelima
    Ayad, Martina
    Costantine, Maged
    Pacheco, Luis
    Jain, Sangeeta
    Saade, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S259 - S260
  • [2] Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Preeclampsia: Development and Validation of the FullPIERS Model EDITORIAL COMMENT
    von Dadelszen, Peter
    Payne, Beth
    Li, Jing
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Pipkin, Fiona Broughton
    Cote, Anne-Marie
    Douglas, M. Joanne
    Gruslin, Andree
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Joseph, K. S.
    Kyle, Phillipa M.
    Lee, Tang
    Loughna, Pamela
    Menzies, Jennifer M.
    Merialdi, Mario
    Millman, Alexandra L.
    Moore, M. Peter
    Moutquin, Jean-Marie
    Ouellet, Annie B.
    Smith, Graeme N.
    Walker, James J.
    Walley, Keith R.
    Walters, Barry N.
    Widmer, Mariana
    Lee, Shoo K.
    Russell, James A.
    Magee, Laura A.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2011, 66 (05) : 267 - 268
  • [3] Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Preeclampsia Using a Risk Prediction Model
    Agrawal S.
    Maitra N.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2016, 66 (Suppl 1) : 104 - 111
  • [4] Validation of the fullPIERS model for prediction of adverse outcomes in preeclampsia at a referral center
    Guida, Jose Paulo Siqueira
    Cralcev, Christopher
    Santos, Juliana Costa
    Marangoni-Junior, Marcos
    Sanchez, Mariana Peccia
    Costa, Maria Laura
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2021, 23 : 112 - 115
  • [5] External validation of the fullPIERS risk prediction model in women with preeclampsia
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Srinivas, Rohini Siva
    Gilgannon, Lauren
    Gupta, Neha
    Long, Danielle
    King, Kenyone
    Rastegar, Aref
    Francis, Matilda
    Attanagoda, Saritha
    Vishnia, Maya
    Flicker, Kari
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S217 - S218
  • [6] Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in preeclampsia at term
    Paul, Tarini D.
    Hastie, Roxanne
    Tong, Stephen
    Keenan, Emerson
    Hiscock, Richard
    Brownfoot, Fiona C.
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2019, 18 : 75 - 81
  • [7] Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes of early severe preeclampsia
    Mirkovic, Ljiljana
    Tulic, Ivan
    Stankovic, Sanja
    Soldatovic, Ivan
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2020, 22 : 144 - 150
  • [8] Assessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia
    Ukah, U. Vivian
    Payne, Beth
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Ganzevoort, Wessel
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Magee, Laura A.
    von Dadelszen, Peter
    HYPERTENSION, 2018, 71 (04) : 659 - 665
  • [9] External Validation of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in a US Cohort of Women With Preeclampsia
    Long, Danielle
    Flicker, Kari
    Vishnia, Maya
    Wright, Madeleine
    Francis, Matilda
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (5S): : 33S - 33S
  • [10] Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Women with Preeclampsia and Eclampsia at a Tertiary Care Center
    Dagdeviren, Hediye
    Cankaya, Atilla
    Cengiz, Huseyin
    Tombul, Tuba
    Kanawati, Ammar
    Caypinar, Sema Suzen
    Ekin, Murat
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2015, 53 (02): : 143 - 146