Impact of central-line-associated bloodstream infections and catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Elangovan, S. [1 ]
Lo, J. J. [2 ]
Xie, Y. [1 ]
Mitchell, B. [3 ]
Graves, N. [1 ]
Cai, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke NUS Med Sch, Programme Hlth Serv & Syst Res, 8 Coll Rd, Singapore 169857, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Avondale Univ, Fac Nursing & Hlth, Cooranbong, Australia
关键词
Central-line bloodstream; infections; Healthcare-associated; Outcomes analysis; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; LENGTH-OF-STAY; HEALTH-CARE; RISK-FACTORS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; ATTRIBUTABLE COST; SINGLE-CENTER; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2024.08.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate effect estimates are needed to inform input parameters of health economic models. Central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheterrelated bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are different definitions used for central-line bloodstream infections and may represent dissimilar patients, but previous metaanalyses did not differentiate between CLABSIs/CRBSIs. Aim: To determine outcome effect estimates in CLABSI and CRBSI patients, compared to uninfected patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched from January 2000 to March 2024 for full-text studies reporting all-cause mortality and/or hospital length of stay (LOS) in adult inpatients with and without CLABSI/CRBSI. Two investigators independently reviewed all potentially relevant studies and performed data extraction. Odds ratio for mortality and mean difference in LOS were pooled using random-effects models. Risk of study bias was assessed using ROBINS-E. Findings: Thirty-six studies were included. Sixteen CLABSI and 12 CRBSI studies reported mortality. The mortality odds ratios of CLABSIs and CRBSIs, compared to uninfected patients, were 3.19 (95% CI: 2.44, 4.16; I2 = 49%) and 2.47(95% CI: 1.51, 4.02; I2 = 82%), respectively. Twelve CLABSI and eight CRBSI studies reported hospital LOS; only three CLABSI studies and two CRBSI studies accounted for the time-dependent nature of CLABSIs/CRBSIs. The mean differences in LOS for CLABSIs and CRBSIs compared to uninfected patients were 16.14 days (95% CI: 9.27, 23.01; I2 = 91%) and 16.26 days (95% CI: 10.19, 22.33; I2 = 66%), respectively. Conclusion: CLABSIs and CRBSIs increase mortality risk and hospital LOS. Few published studies accounted for the time-dependent nature of CLABSIs/CRBSIs, which can result in overestimation of excess hospital LOS. (c) 2024 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 137
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Catheter salvage strategies in children with central venous catheter-related or -associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buonsenso, D.
    Salerno, G.
    Sodero, G.
    Mariani, F.
    Pisapia, L.
    Gelormini, C.
    Di Nardo, M.
    Valentini, P.
    Scoppettuolo, G.
    Biasucci, D. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2022, 125 : 1 - 20
  • [2] Catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Ramritu, Prabha
    Halton, Kate
    Cook, David
    Whitby, Michael
    Graves, Nicholas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [3] Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections Review
    Abebe, Abebe
    Tener, Mitch
    Waller, Stephen
    el Atrouni, Wissam
    [J]. HOSPITAL MEDICINE CLINICS, 2014, 3 (01) : E32 - E49
  • [4] Chlorhexidine Dressings to Prevent Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
    Puig-Asensio, Mireia
    Marra, Alexandre R.
    Childs, Christopher A.
    Perencevich, Eli N.
    Schweizer, Marin L.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 : S165 - S166
  • [5] Catheter-related bloodstream infections
    Sitges-Serra, A
    Girvent, M
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 23 (06) : 589 - 595
  • [6] Catheter-related bloodstream infections
    Jenny-Avital, Elizabeth R.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (12): : 1267 - 1267
  • [7] Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections
    Antonio Sitges-Serra
    Meritxell Girvent
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 1999, 23 : 589 - 595
  • [8] Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: Literature Review
    Ozsurekci, Yasemin
    Oncel, Eda Karada
    Ceyhan, Mehmet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INFECTION, 2013, 7 (01): : 25 - 30
  • [9] Impact of catheter-related bloodstream infections on the mortality of critically ill patients: A meta-analysis
    Siempos, Ilias I.
    Kopterides, Petros
    Tsangaris, Iraklis
    Dimopoulou, Ioanna
    Armaganidis, Apostolos E.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (07) : 2283 - 2289
  • [10] Incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections following ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jun Takeshita
    Kazuya Tachibana
    Yasufumi Nakajima
    Nobuaki Shime
    [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 22