The Circular Economy Lifecycle Assessment and Visualization Framework: A Case Study of Wind Blade Circularity in Texas

被引:8
|
作者
Hanes, Rebecca [1 ]
Ghosh, Tapajyoti [1 ]
Key, Alicia [1 ]
Eberle, Annika [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA
来源
关键词
circular economy; discrete event simulation; life cycle assessment; material flow modeling; multiscale modeling; TURBINE BLADE; MODELS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.3389/frsus.2021.671979
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Moving the current linear economy toward circularity is expected to have environmental, economic, and social impacts. Various modeling methods, including economic input-output modeling, life cycle assessment, agent-based modeling, and system dynamics, have been used to examine circular supply chains and analyze their impacts. This work describes the newly developed Circular Economy Lifecycle Assessment and Visualization (CELAVI) framework, which is designed to model how the impacts of supply chains might change as circularity increases. We first establish the framework with a discussion of modeling capabilities that are needed to capture circularity transitions; these capabilities are based on the fact that supply chains moving toward circularity are dynamic and therefore not at steady state, may encompass multiple industrial sectors or other interdependent supply chains and occupy a large spatial area. To demonstrate the capabilities of CELAVI, we present a case study on end-of-life wind turbine blades in the U.S. state of Texas. Our findings show that depending on exact process costs and transportation distances, mechanical recycling could lead to 69% or more of end-of-life turbine blade mass being kept in circulation rather than being landfilled, with only a 7.1% increase in global warming potential over the linear supply chain. We discuss next steps for framework development.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Circular Economy Life Cycle Assessment and Visualization Framework: A Multistate Case Study of Wind Blade Circularity in United States
    Ghosh, Tapajyoti
    Hanes, Rebecca
    Key, Alicia
    Walzberg, Julien
    Eberle, Annika
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 185
  • [2] Whole building circularity indicator: A circular economy assessment framework for promoting circularity and sustainability in buildings and construction
    Khadim, Nouman
    Agliata, Rosa
    Thaheem, Muhammad Jamaluddin
    Mollo, Luigi
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 241
  • [3] Water Cycle and Circular Economy: Developing a Circularity Assessment Framework for Complex Water Systems
    Nika, C. E.
    Vasilaki, V.
    Exposito, A.
    Katsou, E.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 187 (187)
  • [4] A framework of indicators to measure project circularity in construction circular economy
    Abadi, Mohamed
    Moore, David R.
    Sammuneh, Muhammad Ali
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MANAGEMENT PROCUREMENT AND LAW, 2021, 175 (02) : 54 - 66
  • [5] Comparison between circularity metrics and LCA: A case study on circular economy strategies
    Brandstrom, Johan
    Saidani, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 371
  • [6] Comparison between circularity metrics and LCA: A case study on circular economy strategies
    Brändström, Johan
    Saidani, Michael
    [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 371
  • [7] Wind Turbine Blade Waste Circularity Coupled with Urban Regeneration: A Conceptual Framework
    Karavida, Spyridoula
    Peponi, Angeliki
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [8] Circularity for circularity's sake? Scoping review of assessment methods for environmental performance in the circular economy.
    Harris, Steve
    Martin, Michael
    Diener, Derek
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 26 : 172 - 186
  • [9] Wind turbine blade recycling: Experiences, challenges and possibilities in a circular economy
    Jensen, J. P.
    Skelton, K.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 97 : 165 - 176
  • [10] Circular economy initiatives are no guarantee for increased plastic circularity: A framework for the systematic comparison of initiatives
    Lisiecki M.
    Damgaard A.
    Ragaert K.
    Astrup T.F.
    [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2023, 197