Comparison of Population Density Estimation Methods for Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus)

被引:0
|
作者
Toth, Gergely [1 ]
Katona, Krisztian [1 ]
机构
[1] Hungarian Univ Agr & Life Sci, Inst Wildlife Management & Nat Conservat, Dept Wildlife Biol & Management, Pater Karoly St 1, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary
来源
DIVERSITY-BASEL | 2024年 / 16卷 / 08期
关键词
ungulate; large herbivore; daylight counting; spotlight; thermal camera; strip transect;
D O I
10.3390/d16080500
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) populations have been increasing in Europe in the last decades. Without reliable methods, game managers frequently underestimate the population size, leading to underharvesting. The aim of this research was to identify the most suitable method for roe deer density estimation in lowland, sparsely forested, high-visibility flat areas in Hungary. The census data of the total counting in the daytime strip transect and the night spotlight strip transect, as the total counting of the sample areas with a thermal camera from observation points within 0-250 m and 0-500 m ranges, were compared in seven hunting areas. It was revealed that using the thermal camera within 0-250 m and the spotlight method in the same range gave the statistically highest population density values. There was no significant difference between the two methods. The smallest mean was revealed in the case of the daytime strip transect data. The thermal imaging method gave significantly lower values for the greater distance (250-500 m) than for the range of spotlighting (250 m). The night spotlight strip transect method and the counting from observation points with a thermal camera, both to 250 m, provided the highest values; thus, they are recommended to determine the roe deer population density in open flat areas. They require the same amount of human resources and time, but due to the high cost of the thermal camera, the spotlight is also perfectly suited for widespread use by hunting companies. The results supported the underestimation of roe deer populations.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON OF SOME AGING METHODS IN MALE ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS-CAPREOLUS)
    HRABE, V
    KOUBEK, P
    FOLIA ZOOLOGICA, 1987, 36 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [2] Estimating Population Density of Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus (L.) (Artiodactyla: Cervidae) for Better Management: Comparison of Three Methods
    Popova, Elitsa P.
    Ahmed, Atidzhe A.
    Genov, Peter, V
    Hodzha, Musa M.
    Zlatanova, Diana P.
    ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA, 2019, 71 (04): : 531 - 536
  • [3] Monitoring the density of a roe deer Capreolus capreolus population subjected to heavy hunting pressure
    McIntosh, R
    Burlton, FWE
    McReddie, G
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 79 (1-2) : 99 - 106
  • [4] Polydactyly in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)
    Chapman, NG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 52 (02) : 142 - 144
  • [5] THE ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS-CAPREOLUS)
    MAUBLANC, ML
    CIBIEN, C
    GAILLARD, JM
    MAIZERET, C
    BIDEAU, E
    VINCENT, JP
    REVUE D ECOLOGIE-LA TERRE ET LA VIE, 1991, : 155 - 183
  • [6] Polydactyly in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)
    Norma G. Chapman
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2006, 52 : 142 - 144
  • [7] Spatial patterns and density dependence in the dynamics of a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population in central Italy
    Focardi, S
    Pelliccioni, ER
    Petrucco, R
    Toso, S
    OECOLOGIA, 2002, 130 (03) : 411 - 419
  • [8] Spatial patterns and density dependence in the dynamics of a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population in central Italy
    Stefano Focardi
    Elisabetta Pelliccioni
    Roberta Petrucco
    Silvano Toso
    Oecologia, 2002, 130 : 411 - 419
  • [9] Body mass: an indicator to monitor roe deer population (Capreolus capreolus)
    Naegeli, Melanie
    Rehnus, Maik
    ALLGEMEINE FORST UND JAGDZEITUNG, 2017, 188 (9-10): : 168 - 175
  • [10] Management of roe deer population (Capreolus capreolus L.) in Serbia
    Popovic, Z.
    Lavadinovic, V.
    Stepic, S.
    Beukovic, D.
    Beukovic, M.
    Vukadinovic, M.
    Polovinski-Horvatovic, M.
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2023, 75 (02) : 347 - 354