Qualitative genomic research with Indigenous peoples: a scoping review of participatory practice

被引:0
|
作者
Ehman, Morgan [1 ]
Caron, Nadine R. [2 ,3 ]
Montour, Laurie [4 ]
Regier, Dean A. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Res Inst, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, UBC Ctr Excellence Indigenous Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Nations Hlth Author Chair Canc & Wellness UBC 1, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med Genet, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
Accountability; Health services research; Qualitative study; Review; HEALTH RESEARCH; COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; BIOBANKING; DISSEMINATION; PERSPECTIVES; VIEWS; MAORI; CBPR;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015377
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Indigenous peoples and perspectives are under-represented within genomic research. Qualitative methods can help redress this under-representation by informing the development of inclusive genomic resources aligned with Indigenous rights and interests. The difficult history of genomic research with Indigenous peoples requires that research be conducted responsibly and collaboratively. Research guidelines offer structuring principles, yet little guidance exists on how principles translate into practical, community-led methods. We identified the scope and nature of participatory practice described in published qualitative genomic research studies with Indigenous peoples.Methods We performed a search of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus and the Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples in North America. Eligible studies reported qualitative methods investigating genomics-related topics with Indigenous populations in Canada, the USA, Australia or New Zealand. Abstracted participatory practices were defined through a literature review and mapped to a published ethical genomic research framework.Results We identified 17 articles. Published articles described a breadth of methods across a diversity of Indigenous peoples and settings. Reported practices frequently promoted Indigenous-partnered research regulation, community engagement and co-creation of research methods. The extent of participatory and community-led practice appeared to decrease as studies progressed.Conclusion Applying non-prescriptive Indigenous genomic research guidelines to qualitative inquiry can be achieved through varied methodological approaches. Our findings affirm the adaptive nature of this process in real-world settings and identify opportunities for participatory practice and improved reporting across the research lifecycle. These findings and the breadth of characterised applied research practices are instructive for researchers seeking to develop much-needed qualitative genomic research partnerships.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Culturally safe and ethical biomarker and genomic research with Indigenous peoples—a scoping review
    Rebecca Dal Pra
    Penny O’Brien
    Huong X. T. Nguyen
    Joanne Luke
    Robyn A. Smith
    Adrienne Withall
    Kylie Radford
    Louise M. Lavrencic
    Rosie Watson
    Leon Flicker
    Dina Logiudice
    BMC Global and Public Health, 2 (1):
  • [2] Rethinking Participatory Research with Indigenous Peoples
    Gaudet, Janice Cindy
    NAIS-NATIVE AMERICAN AND INDIGENOUS STUDIES ASSOCIATION, 2014, 1 (02): : 69 - 88
  • [3] Engaging Indigenous peoples in research on commercial tobacco control: a scoping review
    Lee, Kelley
    Smith, Julia
    Thompson, Sheryl
    ALTERNATIVE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, 2020, 16 (04) : 332 - 355
  • [4] What does it mean to conduct participatory research with Indigenous peoples? A lexical review
    Ann Dadich
    Loretta Moore
    Valsamma Eapen
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [5] What does it mean to conduct participatory research with Indigenous peoples? A lexical review
    Dadich, Ann
    Moore, Loretta
    Eapen, Valsamma
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [6] Aging Well for Indigenous Peoples: A Scoping Review
    Quigley, Rachel
    Russell, Sarah G.
    Larkins, Sarah
    Taylor, Sean
    Sagigi, Betty
    Strivens, Edward
    Redman-MacLaren, Michelle
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [7] An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research
    Aramoana, Jaclyn
    Koea, Jonathan
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 : 83 - 91
  • [8] Arts-based research methods with indigenous peoples: an international scoping review
    Hammond, Chad
    Gifford, Wendy
    Thomas, Roanne
    Rabaa, Seham
    Thomas, Ovini
    Domecq, Marie-Cecile
    ALTERNATIVE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, 2018, 14 (03) : 260 - 276
  • [9] Qualitative Research, Indigenous Peoples and Political Process
    Rodriguez, Hector Calleros
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE CIENCIAS POLITICAS Y SOCIALES, 2022, 67 (245): : 371 - 394
  • [10] 'Participatory' conservation research involving indigenous peoples and local communities: Fourteen principles for good practice
    Newing, Helen
    Brittain, Stephanie
    Buchadas, Ana
    del Giorgio, Olivia
    Grasham, Catherine Fallon
    Ferritto, Robert
    Marquez, Jaime Ricardo Garcia
    Khanyari, Munib
    Koenig, Bettina
    Kulkarni, Apoorva
    Murali, Ranjini
    Qin, Siyu
    Rakowski, Judith
    Winn, Fleur
    Ghoddousi, Arash
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 296