Sensitivity and specificity evaluation of refractive condition self-assessment

被引:0
|
作者
DI Vizio, A. [1 ,4 ]
Stefano, S. [2 ]
Tavazzi, S. [3 ,4 ]
Zeri, F. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Roma TRE Univ Rome, Dept Sci Dept, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Opt & Optometry Degree Course, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Mat Sci, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Res Ctr Opt & Optometry COMiB, Milan, Italy
[5] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham, England
关键词
D O I
10.1393/ncc/i2024-24328-0
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
. - The self-report questionnaires could be used as alternative tests to detect refractive errors, although objective and subjective refraction are considered the gold standard procedure. This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of two self-questionnaires (Q1 and Q2) to identify refractive status. Q1 required to identify refractive error by only scientific term: myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism and presbyopia. In Q2, the options combine the scientific term with a descriptive explanation. A multi-center, randomized double-blind study was conducted. Two hundred and forty-five participants completed one of two questionnaires before a non-cycloplegic eye examination by an optometrist. Sensitivity and specificity were determined comparing the self-reported responses with the classification obtained from subjective refraction. For myopia, the Q1 and Q2 reported a good sensitivity and specificity. The relationship between the operating characteristics of Q1 and Q2 was evaluated by the ROC curve. Both the questionnaires used in the study resulted reliable for identifying myopia although they were not highly accurate for the identification of the remaining visual defects.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Specificity and sensitivity of the Self-assessment of Negative Symptoms (SNS) in patients with schizophrenia
    Dollfus, Sonia
    Delouche, Camille
    Hervochon, Cecile
    Mach, Cyril
    Bourgeois, Valerie
    Rotharmel, Maud
    Trehout, Maxime
    Vandevelde, Anais
    Guillin, Olivier
    Morello, Remy
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2019, 211 : 51 - 55
  • [3] The inclusion of self-assessment in merit evaluation
    Rigler, Kenneth L.
    Cook-Benjamin, Lorie
    Wieland, Regi
    Tholstrup, Carrie
    COGENT EDUCATION, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [4] Self-assessment of refractive errors using a simple optical approach
    Leube, Alexander
    Kraft, Caroline
    Ohlendorf, Arne
    Wahl, Siegfried
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2018, 101 (03) : 386 - 391
  • [5] RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY IN THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF WELL-BEING
    CLARKE, PRF
    SPEAR, FG
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1964, 17 (55): : A18 - A18
  • [6] Relationship between self-assessment and clinical evaluation of dental plaque and gingival condition in Japanese adolescents
    Shizuma, Y.
    Zaitsu, T.
    Ueno, M.
    Ohnuki, M.
    Kawaguchi, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE, 2018, 16 (01) : 144 - 150
  • [7] A self-assessment procedure for use in evaluation training
    Stufflebeam, DL
    Wingate, LA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2005, 26 (04) : 544 - 561
  • [8] VALIDITY OF SELF-ASSESSMENT - A FIELD-EVALUATION
    FOX, S
    DINUR, Y
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 41 (03) : 581 - 592
  • [9] Self-assessment
    Nadello, Vijayanand
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (01): : 69 - 70
  • [10] Self-assessment
    Nadella, Viyayanand
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (12): : 739 - 740