Regret cross-efficiency evaluation using attitudinal entropy approach

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Guo-liang [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Xiao-lei [1 ,2 ]
Lou, Yuan-yu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Teng [1 ,2 ]
Guan, Zhong-cheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; WEIGHT FLEXIBILITY; DEA MODELS; RANKING; PERFORMANCE; AGGREGATION; INTERVALS; AVERSION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-024-03817-5
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a popular nonparametric tool for measuring the performance of decision making unit (DMU). Cross-efficiency evaluation is an efficient means to rank DMUs, which compensates for efficiency overestimation and incomplete ranking of conventional DEA models. With respect to incomplete rational cross-efficiency evaluation, the common methods construct models with two extreme efficiencies as reference, such as efficiency values of the aggressive and benevolent models. In addition, they only explore the irrational preferences of decision maker (DM) at a certain stage in the evaluation process. They fail to investigate the cross-efficiency evaluation synthetically under incomplete rationality and characterize the complexity of the individuals' decision making. To fill this gap, a new method must be proposed. This paper proposes a new cross-efficiency termed regret cross-efficiency model using attitudinal entropy approach (RACE), which constructs a secondary goal model from a comprehensive perspective under the framework of regret theory, and introduces attitudinal entropy to aggregate the cross-efficiencies. Besides, this paper presents some empirical examples to illustrate the validity and robustness of the RACE method.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation based on prospect theory and regret theory
    Fan, Jianping
    Tian, Ge
    Wu, Meiqin
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 45 (04) : 6035 - 6045
  • [2] Fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation: a possibility approach
    Ruiz, Jose L.
    Sirvent, Inmaculada
    FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 16 (01) : 111 - 126
  • [3] An alternative neutral approach for cross-efficiency evaluation
    Carrillo, Marianela
    Jorge, Jesus M.
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 120 : 137 - 145
  • [4] Fuzzy cross-efficiency evaluation: a possibility approach
    José L. Ruiz
    Inmaculada Sirvent
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2017, 16 : 111 - 126
  • [5] AN INTEGRATED APPROACH USING CROSS-EFFICIENCY AND SHAPLEY VALUE IN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
    Lin, Yang
    Liu, Wen-li
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2019, 53 (04): : 209 - 224
  • [6] Assessment of Iranian airlines using network cross-efficiency DEA and the regret theory
    Ganji, S. S.
    Mardani, Abbas
    Jahed, Rasul
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2024, 18
  • [7] A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization
    Liu, Yong-Jun
    Yang, Guo-Sen
    Zhang, Wei-Guo
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 126
  • [8] Efficiency evaluation with regret-rejoice cross-efficiency DEA models under the distributed linguistic environment
    Jin, Feifei
    Cai, Yuhang
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Liu, Jinpei
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 169
  • [9] A regret cross-efficiency ranking method considering consensus consistency
    Liu, Dun
    Chen, Qinxia
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 208
  • [10] A balanced data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation approach
    Li, Feng
    Zhu, Qingyuan
    Chen, Zhi
    Xue, Hanbing
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 106 : 154 - 168