The Blockage Effect on Resistance Coefficients Estimation for AUVs with Different Configurations in the Towing Tank

被引:1
|
作者
Ye, Pengcheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Yao [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Qiaogao [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Guang [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Denghui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Key Lab Unmanned Underwater Vehicle, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
关键词
AUVs; towing tank; blockage effect; resistance coefficients; numerical simulation; DRAG;
D O I
10.3390/jmse12091532
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
When a resistance test of an underwater vehicle model is conducted in a towing tank, the blockage effect will inevitably occur, particularly since the experimental model is relatively large. This paper investigates the estimation of resistance coefficients for an Axisymmetrical Rotary Body Underwater Vehicle (ARBUV) and a Blended Wing Body Underwater Vehicle (BWBUV). The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method is employed to predict the resistance of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs). In order to quantify the blockage effect on the resistance coefficients of AUVs with different configurations, the resistance coefficients of AUVs are calculated in the infinite domain and finite domain under various blockage ratios. Through analysis of the resistance results, velocity distribution, and pressure distribution, the action law of the blockage effect is provided. It indicates that blockage effects have a greater influence on the pressure resistance for ARBUV. Surprisingly, the resistance coefficients of BWBUV are less affected, though it is closer to the sidewalls. It suggests that the blockage ratio of ARBUV and BWBUV should be separately smaller than 0.375% and 2.5% in the towing tank test. The towing tank experiments satisfy the blocking ratio with a Reynolds number greater than 107, which saturates the blocking effect and further reduces the effect on the drag coefficient.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Numerical and Experimental Study of Blockage Effect Correction Method in Towing Tank
    Chun-yu Guo
    Pei Xu
    Chao Wang
    Zi Kan
    China Ocean Engineering, 2019, 33 : 522 - 536
  • [2] Numerical and Experimental Study of Blockage Effect Correction Method in Towing Tank
    Guo Chun-yu
    Xu Pei
    Wang Chao
    Kan Zi
    CHINA OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 33 (05) : 522 - 536
  • [3] Numerical and Experimental Study of Blockage Effect Correction Method in Towing Tank
    GUO Chun-yu
    XU Pei
    WANG Chao
    KAN Zi
    China Ocean Engineering, 2019, 33 (05) : 522 - 536
  • [4] Estimation of viscous and inertial resistance coefficients for various heat sink configurations
    Nowak, Remigiusz
    SELECTED PAPERS FROM IX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER (ICCHMT2016), 2016, 157 : 122 - 130
  • [5] Effect of Different EndoAnchor Configurations on Aortic Endograft Displacement Resistance: An Experimental Study
    Goudeketting, Seline R.
    Vermeulen, Jenske J. M.
    van Noort, Kim
    Scholten, Gerben te Riet o g
    Kuipers, Henny
    Slump, Cornelis H.
    de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2019, 26 (05) : 704 - 713
  • [6] The Effect of the Conversion Coefficients of Platinum-Based Resistance Thermometers on the Uncertainty Estimation
    Alper, F. M. Patan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMODYNAMICS, 2023, 26 (02) : 73 - 76
  • [7] Effect of different configurations of diffusion gradient directions on accuracy of diffusion tensor estimation in cardiac DTI
    He, Yunlong
    Wang, Lihui
    Yang, Feng
    Clarysse, Patrick
    Robini, Marc
    Zhu, Yuemin
    2022 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICSP2022), VOL 1, 2022, : 437 - 441
  • [8] Study of effect of rotational axis configurations on the slosh dynamics of the ship-mounted tank under different combinations of rotational excitations
    Abdullah, Khawaja Muhammad
    Basit, Muhammad Abdul
    Shah, Ajmal
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 29 (02) : 353 - 371