A systematic review and research recommendations on artificial intelligence for automated cervical cancer detection

被引:0
|
作者
Khare, Smith K. [1 ,2 ]
Blanes-Vidal, Victoria [1 ]
Booth, Berit Bargum [3 ]
Petersen, Lone Kjeld [4 ]
Nadimi, Esmaeil S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Maersk Mc Kinney Moller Inst, Fac Engn, Appl AI & Data Sci Unit, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Ctr Clin Artificial Intelligence, Odense, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Odense, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Res Unit Gynecol & Obstet Odense, Odense, Denmark
关键词
artificial intelligence; cervical cancer; colposcopy; computed tomography; deep learning; histology; human papillomavirus; machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; pap smear cytology; Positron emission tomography; HISTOLOGY IMAGE-ANALYSIS; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; LEARNING TECHNIQUES; RISK; CLASSIFICATION; INFECTION; FEATURES; CELLS; CERVICOGRAPHY; ADOLESCENT;
D O I
10.1002/widm.1550
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Early diagnosis of abnormal cervical cells enhances the chance of prompt treatment for cervical cancer (CrC). Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision support systems for detecting abnormal cervical cells are developed because manual identification needs trained healthcare professionals, and can be difficult, time-consuming, and error-prone. The purpose of this study is to present a comprehensive review of AI technologies used for detecting cervical pre-cancerous lesions and cancer. The review study includes studies where AI was applied to Pap Smear test (cytological test), colposcopy, sociodemographic data and other risk factors, histopathological analyses, magnetic resonance imaging-, computed tomography-, and positron emission tomography-scan-based imaging modalities. We performed searches on Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, and Inspec. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines were used to search, screen, and analyze the articles. The primary search resulted in identifying 9745 articles. We followed strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, which include search windows of the last decade, journal articles, and machine/deep learning-based methods. A total of 58 studies have been included in the review for further analysis after identification, screening, and eligibility evaluation. Our review analysis shows that deep learning models are preferred for imaging techniques, whereas machine learning-based models are preferred for sociodemographic data. The analysis shows that convolutional neural network-based features yielded representative characteristics for detecting pre-cancerous lesions and CrC. The review analysis also highlights the need for generating new and easily accessible diverse datasets to develop versatile models for CrC detection. Our review study shows the need for model explainability and uncertainty quantification to increase the trust of clinicians and stakeholders in the decision-making of automated CrC detection models. Our review suggests that data privacy concerns and adaptability are crucial for deployment hence, federated learning and meta-learning should also be explored. This article is categorized under: Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Explainable AI Technologies > Machine Learning Technologies > Classification
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emotion recognition and artificial intelligence: A systematic review (2014-2023) and research recommendations
    Khare, Smith K.
    Blanes-Vidal, Victoria
    Nadimi, Esmaeil S.
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2024, 102
  • [2] Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer and Pre-Cancerous Lesions by Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
    Allahqoli, Leila
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Mazidimoradi, Afrooz
    Salehiniya, Hamid
    Guenther, Veronika
    Chiantera, Vito
    Goghari, Shirin Karimi
    Ghiasvand, Mohammad Matin
    Rahmani, Azam
    Momenimovahed, Zohre
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [3] A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer
    Van Booven, Derek J.
    Kuchakulla, Manish
    Pai, Raghav
    Frech, Fabio S.
    Ramasahayam, Reshna
    Reddy, Pritika
    Parmar, Madhumita
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Arora, Himanshu
    [J]. RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 31 - 39
  • [4] Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Peng Jin
    Xiaoyan Ji
    Wenzhe Kang
    Yang Li
    Hao Liu
    Fuhai Ma
    Shuai Ma
    Haitao Hu
    Weikun Li
    Yantao Tian
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2020, 146 : 2339 - 2350
  • [5] Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Jin, Peng
    Ji, Xiaoyan
    Kang, Wenzhe
    Li, Yang
    Liu, Hao
    Ma, Fuhai
    Ma, Shuai
    Hu, Haitao
    Li, Weikun
    Tian, Yantao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (09) : 2339 - 2350
  • [6] Artificial intelligence for skin cancer detection and classification for clinical environment: a systematic review
    Furriel, Brunna C. R. S.
    Oliveira, Bruno D.
    Proa, Renata
    Paiva, Joselisa Q.
    Loureiro, Rafael M.
    Calixto, Wesley P.
    Reis, Marcio R. C.
    Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 10
  • [7] Breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence techniques: A systematic literature review
    Nassif, Ali Bou
    Abu Talib, Manar
    Nasir, Qassim
    Afadar, Yaman
    Elgendy, Omar
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2022, 127
  • [8] Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review
    Yao, Xiaomei
    Kumar, Mithilesh, V
    Su, Esther
    Miranda, Athena Flores
    Saha, Ashirbani
    Sussman, Jonathan
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 88
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence for Cancer detection and Genetic Research
    Miyake, Jun
    [J]. CANCER SCIENCE, 2018, 109 : 288 - 288
  • [10] Artificial intelligence in outcomes research: a systematic scoping review
    Graili, Pooyeh
    Ieraci, Luciano
    Hosseinkhah, Nazanin
    Argent-Katwala, Mary
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) : 601 - 623