Continuity of patient care;
Hospital-to-home transitions;
Patient discharge summaries;
Drug therapy;
Health information exchange;
INFORMATION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.zefq.2024.05.008
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Introduction: Discharge from hospital is a risk to drug continuity and medication safety. In Germany, new legal requirements concerning the management of patient discharge from the hospital came into force in 2017. They set minimum requirements for the documentation of medications in patient discharge summaries, which are the primary means of communication at transitions of care. Six years later, data on their practical implementation in routine care are lacking. Methods: Within the scope of an explorative retrospective observational study, the minimum requirements were operationalized and a second set of assessment criteria was derived from the recommendation "Good Prescribing Practice in Drug Therapy" published by the Aktionsb & uuml;ndnis Patientensicherheit e.V. as a comparative quality standard. A sample of discharge summaries was drawn from routine care at the University Hospital Heidelberg and assessed according to their fulfilment of the criteria sets. In addition, the potential influence of certain context factors (e. g., involvement of clinical pharmacists or software usage) was evaluated. Results: In total, 11 quality criteria were derived from the minimum requirements. According to the eligibility criteria (i. e., three or more discharge medications) 352 discharge summaries (42 wards; issued in May-July 2021), containing in total 3,051 medications, were included. The practical implementation of the minimum requirements for documenting medications in patient discharge summaries differed considerably depending on the criterion and defined context factors. Core elements (i. e., drug name, strength, and dosage at discharge) were fulfilled in 82.8 %, while further minimum requirements were rarely met or completely lacking (e. g., explanations for special pharmaceutical forms). Involvement of clinical pharmacists and usage of software were shown to be a facilitator of documentation quality, while on-demand medication (compared to long-term medication) as well as newly prescribed medication (compared to home medication or medication changed during hospitalisation) showed poorer documentation quality. In addition, the documentation quality seemed to depend on the department and the day of discharge. Conclusion: To date, the wording of the German legal requirements allows for different interpretations without considering the respective clinical setting and the medication actually prescribed. For future clarification of the requirements, implications of the wording for the clinical setting should be considered.
机构:
Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
McMaster Univ, Fac Med, Hamilton, ON, CanadaUniv Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
Chuen, Victoria L.
Chan, Adrian C. H.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
Univ Saskatchewan, Fac Med, Saskatoon, SK, CanadaUniv Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
Chan, Adrian C. H.
Ma, Jin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Hlth Network, Biostat Res Unit, Toronto, ON, CanadaUniv Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
Ma, Jin
Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sinai Hlth Syst, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, CanadaUniv Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
Chau, Vicky
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sinai Hlth Syst, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, CanadaUniv Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada