Outcomes and complications of revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Welch, Jessica M. [1 ]
Bethell, Mikhail A. [1 ]
Meyer, Alex M. [1 ]
Hurley, Eoghan T. [1 ]
Levin, Jay M. [1 ]
Pean, Christian A. [1 ]
Anakwenze, Oke [1 ]
Klifto, Christopher S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 40 Duke Med Circle,124 Davison Bldg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; total shoulder arthroplasty; shoulder; systematic review; revision; FUNCTIONAL INTERNAL-ROTATION; CUFF STATUS; BONE LOSS; REPLACEMENT; CONVERSION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.053
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study is to systematically review the evidence in the literature to ascertain the functional outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and complication and reoperation rates after revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for a failed primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA). Methods:<bold> </bold>Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and The Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes for revision RSA for a failed primary TSA or HA. Results:<bold> </bold>Our review found 23 studies including 1041 shoulders (627 TSA and 414 HA) meeting our inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (66.1%), with an average age of 69.0 years (range: 39-93 years) and a mean follow-up of 46.3 months. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and visual analog scale pain scores improved from 32.6 to 61.9 and 6.7 to 2.7, respectively. ROM results include forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation, which improved from 59.4 degrees to 107.7 degrees, 50.7 degrees to 104.4 degrees, and 19.8 degrees to 26.3 degrees, respectively. Only 1 of the 10 studies reporting internal rotation found a statistically significant difference, with the mean internal rotation improving from S1-S3 preoperatively to L4-L5 postoperatively for patients undergoing HA. The overall complication rate and reoperation rate were 23.4% and 12.5%, respectively. The most common complications were glenoid component loosening (6.0%), fracture (periprosthetic, intraoperative, or other scapula fractures) (n = 4.7%), and infection (n = 3.3%). Conclusions:<bold> </bold>Revision RSA for a failed primary TSA and HA has been shown to result in excellent functional outcomes and improved ROM, suggesting that patients who have failed TSA or HA may benefit from a revision RSA.
引用
收藏
页码:2306 / 2313
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Sheth, Mihir M.
    Sholder, Daniel
    Getz, Charles L.
    Williams, Gerald R.
    Namdari, Surena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (06) : 1074 - 1081
  • [2] Can a reverse shoulder arthroplasty be used to revise a failed primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty? REVISION REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY FOR FAILED REVERSE PROSTHESIS
    Wagner, E. R.
    Hevesi, M.
    Houdek, M. T.
    Cofield, R. H.
    Sperling, J. W.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, J.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (11): : 1493 - 1498
  • [3] Risk of Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty After Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Cutler, Holt S.
    DeClercq, Josh
    Ayers, Gregory D.
    Serbin, Philip
    Jain, Nitin
    Khazzam, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [4] Outcomes after salvage reverse shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary fixation or hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review
    Levy, Hannah A.
    Szeto, Stanley
    Starks, Alexandria
    Davis, Daniel E.
    [J]. SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2023, 15 (3_SUPPL) : 6 - 18
  • [5] Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty for painful glenoid arthrosis to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    Sheth, Mihir M.
    Sholder, Daniel
    Abboud, Joseph
    Lazarus, Mark D.
    Ramsey, Matthew L.
    Williams, Gerald R.
    Namdari, Surena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (10) : 1884 - 1890
  • [6] The effect of glenoid bone loss and rotator cuff status in failed anatomic shoulder arthroplasty after revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Franke, Kimberly J.
    Christmas, Kaitlyn N.
    Simon, Peter
    Mighell, Mark A.
    Frankle, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (04) : 844 - 849
  • [7] Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid baseplate failure after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Holcomb, Jason O.
    Cuff, Derek
    Petersen, Steve A.
    Pupello, Derek R.
    Rankle, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (05) : 717 - 723
  • [8] Revision shoulder arthroplasty for failed surface replacement hemiarthroplasty
    Jaiswal A.
    Malhotra A.
    Hay S.
    Kelly C.P.
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2019, 103 (1) : 69 - 75
  • [9] Revision of failed shoulder hemiarthroplasty to reverse total arthroplasty: analysis of 157 revision implants
    Merolla, Giovanni
    Wagner, Eric
    Sperling, John W.
    Paladini, Paolo
    Fabbri, Elisabetta
    Porcellini, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [10] Shoulder endoprosthesis in the Elderly Hemiarthroplasty or Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? Anatomic or reverse?
    Kircher, J.
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2017, 46 (01): : 40 - 47