Comparison and integration of physical and interpretable AI-driven models for rainfall-runoff simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Asadi, Sara [1 ]
Jimeno-Saez, Patricia [1 ]
Lopez-Ballesteros, Adrian [1 ]
Senent-Aparicio, Javier [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ San Antonio, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Los Jeronimos S-N, Murcia 30107, Spain
关键词
SWAT+; Machine learning techniques; Ensemble machine learning technique; Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP); Tagus Headwaters River Basin (THRB); MACHINE-LEARNING TECHNIQUES; WATER; SWAT; HYDROLOGY; NETWORKS; BASIN; SOIL; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103048
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Precise streamflow forecasting in river systems is crucial for water resources management and flood risk assessment. The Tagus Headwaters River Basin (THRB) in Spain is a key hydrological hub, providing regulated flow for agricultural, urban, and energy sectors, and facilitating water transfer to the Segura River Basin, a key semi-arid region. Given the basin's near-total allocation of water resources, accurate streamflow simulations are essential to optimize the socio-economic distribution and ensure sustainable management across both interconnected basins. This study conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT+), support vector regression (SVR), feed forward neural network (FFNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models in simulating the rainfall-runoff process at four gauging stations within the THRB. An ensemble machine learning technique is then applied to assess improvements in streamflow estimation. Results revealed that AI-based models significantly surpassed the SWAT+ model in performance. Furthermore, the application of an ensemble technique enhanced the precision of rainfall-runoff modeling by 18 to 26% during the calibration period and 4.1 to 9.2% during the validation period, compared to individual AI-based models. Additionally, the SWAT+ model's precision improved by 44 to 74% and 40 to 55% for the respective periods. The use of Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) methodology allowed the results of the ensemble with machine learning to be more interpretable by explaining how each model contributes to the prediction. This research offers significant contributions to hydrological modeling, highlighting the importance of ensemble techniques in elevating predictive accuracy for various river basins.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS
    WEEKS, WD
    HEBBERT, RHB
    [J]. NORDIC HYDROLOGY, 1980, 11 (01) : 7 - 24
  • [2] Generating interpretable rainfall-runoff models automatically from data
    Dantzer, Travis Adrian
    Kerkez, Branko
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2024, 193
  • [3] CALIBRATION OF CONCEPTUAL MODELS FOR RAINFALL-RUNOFF SIMULATION
    JAIN, SK
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1993, 38 (05): : 431 - 441
  • [5] Comparative evaluation of conceptual and physical rainfall-runoff models
    Jaiswal, R. K.
    Ali, Sohrat
    Bharti, Birendra
    [J]. APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [6] Watershed models and their applicability to the simulation of the rainfall-runoff relationship
    Hadadin, A. N.
    [J]. Advances in Fluid Mechanics VI, 2006, 52 : 193 - 202
  • [7] Comparison of eight rainfall-runoff models for flood simulations
    Ribarova, I.
    Ninov, P. I.
    Volk, M.
    Melone, F.
    Moramarco, T.
    Safiolea, E.
    Panagopoulos, Y.
    Zdralewicz, M.
    Berni, N.
    Ghinescu, A.
    [J]. INTEGRATING WATER SYSTEMS, 2010, : 755 - +
  • [8] Comparison of antecedent precipitation based rainfall-runoff models
    Upreti, Pankaj
    Ojha, C. S. P.
    [J]. WATER SUPPLY, 2021, 21 (05) : 2122 - 2138
  • [9] RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS.
    Abdel-Aal, Farouk M.
    [J]. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1982, 1 (02): : 105 - 119
  • [10] Runoff components simulated by rainfall-runoff models
    Buchtele, J
    Elias, V
    Tesar, M
    Herrmann, A
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1996, 41 (01): : 49 - 60