Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Reveals Superior Gluteus Medius Muscle Vitality After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Versus Lateral Surgical Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Paul, Mick [1 ]
Robin, Schaible [1 ]
Tobias, Renkawitz [1 ]
Tilman, Walker [1 ]
Moritz, Innmann [1 ]
Stefanos, Tsitlakidis [1 ]
Mustafa, Hariri [1 ]
Julian, Doll [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Schlierbacher Landstr 200a, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2024年 / 50卷 / 11期
关键词
CEUS; Gluteus medius; Minimally invasive; Total hip arthroplasty; Muscle vitality;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.07.004
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is essential for treating severe osteoarthritis. With various surgical approaches available, there has been a shift toward techniques that offer quicker recovery and fewer complications. In this study, contrast-enhanced ultrasound was used to evaluate the impact of the minimally invasive anterolateral versus conventional lateral approach in THA on the gluteus medius muscle, focusing on muscle vitality and functional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 64 patients who underwent unilateral THA (26 lateral and 38 anterolateral) was conducted. Muscle strength was measured alongside joint flexibility and patient-reported outcome measures. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were conducted to visualize gluteus medius microperfusion. CEUS data were analyzed using VueBox 7.1 software and microperfusion parameters were calculated using peak enhancement (PE), wash-in perfusion index (WiPI) and rise time for muscle vitality evaluation. Results: Patients from the anterolateral group exhibited higher relative muscle strength in the operated hip compared with the healthy side (96 +/- 23% vs. 86 +/- 23%, p = 0.048). CEUS revealed superior gluteus medius micro- perfusion in the anterolateral group (PE 36,300 +/- 42,000 arbitrary units [a.u.] vs. 20,400 +/- 20,200 a.u., p = 0.024; WiPI 23,600 +/- 27,300 a.u. vs. 13,500 +/- 13,300 a.u., p = 0.027). A positive Trendelenburg sign was evident in 2 out of 26 patients in the lateral group compared with none in the anterolateral group (chi 2 2 = 0.082), indicating higher rates of gluteal insufficiency in the lateral approach group. Conclusion: Significantly higher muscle perfusion parameters in the anterolateral group, alongside improved muscle strength recovery, hint at a subtle but important advantage regarding post-operative recovery of the anterolateral approach. These findings support the ongoing trend toward minimally invasive surgical approaches in THA.
引用
收藏
页码:1684 / 1689
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty depending on age, BMI, and surgical approach. Minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach
    Mueller, M.
    Tohtz, S.
    Dewey, M.
    Springer, I.
    Perka, C.
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2011, 40 (03): : 217 - 223
  • [2] Minimally invasive anterolateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty:: Early clinical results
    Roettinger, H.
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 16 (02) : S42 - S47
  • [3] Minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus lateral transmuscular approach for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shigemura, Tomonori
    Murata, Yasuaki
    Yamamoto, Yohei
    Shiratani, Yuki
    Hamano, Hiroyuki
    Wada, Yuichi
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2022, 20 (05): : E254 - E261
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Surgical Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Seven-Year Results
    Musil, D.
    Stehlik, J.
    [J]. ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2013, 80 (02) : 138 - 141
  • [5] Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: A prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy
    Mouilhade, F.
    Matsoukis, J.
    Oger, P.
    Mandereau, C.
    Brzakala, V.
    Dujardin, F.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2011, 97 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [6] Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
    T. Repantis
    T. Bouras
    P. Korovessis
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015, 25 (1) : 111 - 116
  • [7] Early results and patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach
    Walde, Tim Alexander
    Blattgerste, Dirk
    Sehmisch, Stefan
    Kuttler, Wolfgang
    Walde, Hans-Joachim
    Koester, Georg
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 19 (04) : 367 - 371
  • [8] Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty by direct minimally invasive anterolateral approach: A controlled study
    Lalevee, Matthieu
    Martinez, Lucas
    Rey, Benjamin
    Beldame, Julien
    Matsoukis, Jean
    Poirier, Thomas
    Brunel, Helena
    Van Driesschef, Stephane
    Noe, Nathalie
    Billuart, Fabien
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2023, 109 (07)
  • [9] Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach
    Michael Müller
    Stephan Tohtz
    Ivonne Springer
    Marc Dewey
    Carsten Perka
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2011, 131 : 179 - 189
  • [10] Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach
    Mueller, Michael
    Tohtz, Stephan
    Springer, Ivonne
    Dewey, Marc
    Perka, Carsten
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2011, 131 (02) : 179 - 189