Looking beyond marital status: What we can learn from relationship status measures

被引:0
|
作者
Compton, D'Lane [1 ]
Kaufman, Gayle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, Dept Sociol, New Orleans, LA USA
[2] Davidson Coll, Dept Sociol, Davidson, NC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LGBT; marriage; measurement; quantitative methodology; relationships; COHABITATION; DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION; DIVERSITY; HAPPINESS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/jomf.13021
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: With needed and growing attention to sexual minorities and unmarried individuals, there is a need to consider how best to capture relationships and relationship organization in family studies. Background: Traditional measures of marital status are commonly used to examine differences in relationships and socioeconomic outcomes, but they do not adequately capture the diversity of relationship experiences and leave certain types of relationship experiences invisible. Method: This article examines the inclusion of a relationship measure in the American Marriage Survey, a national probability-based sample of 2806 adults in the United States, to provide a more diverse and expansive perspective on relationships and relationship organization. While there is a great deal of overlap between those who are married or cohabiting (marital status) and those who are in an exclusive relationship (relationship status), there is also potential for variation in what kinds of relationships, if any, people are in. Results: We find that the relationship measure is particularly useful in showing that a majority of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and pansexual individuals are in an exclusive relationship and also that gender and sexual minorities are more likely than cisgender and heterosexual individuals to be in consensual nonmonogamous relationships. This article also provides direction on re-coding open text responses from the relationship status measure. Conclusion: We conclude that a relationship status measure allows for greater inclusivity and visibility of sexual minorities and unmarried persons, including but not limited to queer individuals, families, and communities, as well as consensual nonmonogamous relationships.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What can we learn from status epilepticus registries?
    Ferlisi, Monica
    Hocker, Sara
    EPILEPSIA, 2013, 54 : 72 - 73
  • [2] What We Can Learn from Looking at Profanity
    Laboreiro, Gustavo
    Oliveira, Eugenio
    COMPUTATIONAL PROCESSING OF THE PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE, 2014, 8775 : 108 - 113
  • [3] What can we learn from animal models of convulsive status epilepticus?
    Bauer, S.
    Norwood, B. A.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EPILEPTOLOGIE, 2013, 26 (02): : 70 - 74
  • [4] Beyond multimorbidity: What can we learn from complexity science?
    Sturmberg, Joachim P.
    Getz, Linn O.
    Stange, Kurt C.
    Upshur, Ross E. G.
    Mercer, Stewart W.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (05) : 1187 - 1193
  • [5] WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THAT
    JULIANO, C
    TRUESWELL, JC
    TANENHAUS, MK
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1992, 30 (06) : 473 - 473
  • [6] What can we learn from it?
    Bogaerts, A
    Gijbels, R
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 69 (23) : A719 - A727
  • [7] Venturing Beyond Beans and Peas: What Can We Learn from Chamaecrista?
    Singer, Susan R.
    Maki, Sonja L.
    Farmer, Andrew D.
    Ilut, Dan
    May, Gregory D.
    Cannon, Steven B.
    Doyle, Jeff J.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 151 (03) : 1041 - 1047
  • [8] The journey to the DNP program and beyond: What can we learn from pharmacy?
    Upvall, Michelej.
    Ptachcinski, RichardJ.
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2007, 23 (05) : 316 - 321
  • [9] Beyond DNA puffs: What can we learn from studying sciarids?
    Simon, Claudio Roberto
    Siviero, Fabio
    Monesi, Nadia
    GENESIS, 2016, 54 (07) : 361 - 378
  • [10] What can we learn by looking for the first code of professional ethics?
    Michael Davis
    Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2003, 24 : 433 - 454