Experimental identification of longitudinal and vertical lift aerodynamic admittance functions of thin sections

被引:0
|
作者
Yan, Lei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gao, Min [1 ]
He, Xuhui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Ze [4 ]
Shi, Mingjie [5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Engn Res Ctr High Speed Railway Construct, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Prov Key Lab Disaster Prevent & Mitigat Rail, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Municipal Engn Design Inst Grp Co Ltd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Pujiang Bridge & Tunnel Operat Management, Shanghai 200231, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
BUFFETING RESPONSE; BRIDGE DECK; CYLINDERS; AIRFOIL; FORCES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1063/5.0228765
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Previous studies of two-dimensional (2D) aerodynamic admittance function (AAF) identification methods have basically ignored the effects of different turbulence components, which may lead to unpredictable errors for practical engineering applications. This paper presents pressure measurement experiments on thin sections with a geometric ratio of 1:50 in various turbulent fields. Based on the three-dimensional (3D) two-wavenumber theoretical analytical framework, the two-wavenumber coherence function is obtained by fitting the measured spanwise root-coherence function at the effective spacing with an empirical model. A new method is proposed, assuming that the ratio relationship between the lift AAFs due to longitudinal and vertical turbulence components of the measured model section satisfies its corresponding theoretical solution ratio relationship. The 2D lift AAFs of the airfoil section induced by different turbulence components are identified following the proposed identification framework. Consistent with the previous research, force correlation is significantly larger than turbulence correlation, and the traditional 3D one-wavenumber AAFs obtained are different in different turbulent fields. The separated 2D lift AAFs demonstrate that the contributions of u- and w- turbulence to the buffeting lift force are significantly different, and are more precise, according to the ratio between the Horlock function and Sears function. Then, the method is successfully extended to estimate the AAFs with respect to the u- and w-turbulence components of a streamlined box girder section, further validating the applicability of the identification method to the streamlined box girder. Furthermore, comparing the separated 2D lift AAFs under different turbulence fields reveals their independence from turbulence characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Aerodynamic admittance functions of bridge deck sections by CWE
    Bruno, L.
    Tubino, F.
    [J]. Structural Dynamics - EURODYN 2005, Vols 1-3, 2005, : 409 - 414
  • [2] IDENTIFICATION OF SIX COMPLEX AERODYNAMIC ADMITTANCE FUNCTIONS FOR THE THIN PLATE SECTION MODEL
    Han, Y.
    Chen, Z. Q.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES, 2010, : 104 - 111
  • [3] Identification of aerodynamic admittance functions in active grid generated turbulent flow
    Kildal, Oddbjorn
    Petersen, Oyvind Wiig
    Oiseth, Ole
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2024, 246 (246)
  • [4] The effect of three-dimensionality on the aerodynamic admittance of thin sections in free stream turbulence
    Massaro, M.
    Graham, J. M. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2015, 57 : 81 - 90
  • [5] Identification and Application of the Aerodynamic Admittance Functions of a Double-Deck Truss Girder
    Liu, Haosu
    Lei, Junqing
    Zhu, Li
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [6] Experimental determination of aerodynamic admittance functions of a bridge deck considering oscillation effect
    Yan, Lei
    Xu, Le Dong
    He, Xu Hui
    Flay, Richard G. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2019, 190 : 83 - 97
  • [7] Quantifying the aerodynamic admittance and spanwise coherence functions of buffeting lift for bridge decks through the measurement of segmental forces
    Jiang, Hongsheng
    Li, Shaopeng
    Chen, Xinzhong
    Li, Zhiyang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2024, 253
  • [8] Experimental study on aerodynamic admittance functions of the train under the stationary thunderstorm downburst wind
    Hu, Peng
    Zhang, Fei
    Han, Yan
    Wang, Ningning
    Yan, Naijie
    Wang, Sailong
    [J]. Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2024, 57 (10): : 33 - 46
  • [9] Identification and application of six-component aerodynamic admittance functions of a closed-box bridge deck
    Zhu, Ledong
    Zhou, Qi
    Ding, Quanshun
    Xu, Ziran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2018, 172 : 268 - 279
  • [10] Identification of aerodynamic admittance functions of a flat closed-box deck in different grid-generated turbulent wind fields
    Yan, Lei
    Zhu, Le-Dong
    Flay, Richard George James
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 (03) : 380 - 395