Investigating the impact of surface treatments on tensile bond strength between pediatric prefabricated zirconia crowns and primary maxillary incisors with various types of luting cement: an in vitro study

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of two surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) using bioactive and resin cements. MethodsForty extracted human primary maxillary incisors were prepared and divided into four groups based on surface treatment and cement type: (1) sandblast with bioactive cement, (2) sandblast with resin cement, (3) 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) with bioactive cement, and (4) 10-MDP with resin cement. After 24 h of cementation, specimens underwent 5000 thermocycling cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C. Tensile bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test, with significance set at p < 0.05. ResultsThe mean tensile bond strengths observed were 2.25 +/- 1.27 MPa for sandblast with bioactive cement, 1.39 +/- 0.95 MPa for sandblast with resin cement, 2.45 +/- 1.15 MPa for 10-MDP with bioactive cement, and 1.68 +/- 1.03 MPa for 10-MDP with resin cement. Significant improvements in bond strength were observed in the bioactive cement group treated with 10-MDP compared to those treated with sandblasting (p < 0.05). The 10-MDP treatment did not enhance bond strength for the resin cement compared to sandblasting. ConclusionsBioactive cement generally provides a higher tensile bond strength than resin cement. While 10-MDP treatment enhances bond strength when used with bioactive cement, it does not show a similar enhancement when used with resin cement compared to sandblasting, indicating its effectiveness is selective based on the type of cement used.