Leveraging Multi-Sectoral Partnership for Colorectal Cancer Education and Screening in the African American Community: A Protocol and Preliminary Results

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jungyoon [1 ]
Dai, Hongying Daisy [2 ]
Michaud, Tzeyu [3 ]
Verma, Sachi [4 ]
King, Keyonna M. [3 ]
Ewing Jr, John W. [5 ]
Mabiala-Maye, Grace [1 ]
Estabrooks, Paul [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Adm, 984350 Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot, Omaha, NE USA
[4] Nebraska Hosp Assoc, Lincoln, NE USA
[5] Douglas Cty Treasurer Off, Omaha, NE USA
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Hlth & Kinesiol, Coll Hlth, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Cancer education; Multi-sector partnership; Community-based intervention; Fecal immunochemical test; Multi-component approach; Health disparities;
D O I
10.1007/s13187-024-02506-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Colorectal cancer (CRC) awareness and screening rates are still low in African Americans (AAs), especially for those who do not have regular access to health care. We established a multi-sector community partnership between academia, health system, cancer advocacy, and local county treasurer's office (CTO), to test a pilot CRC screening intervention using a tailored educational brochure and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Participants were recruited at a local CTO in an urban midwestern region. Once eligible, participants were assigned to 2-by-2 intervention arms by educational strategy (brochure vs. no brochure) and FIT provision strategy (direct provision by onsite staff vs. indirect provision via phone/online request). We compared the effect of different strategies on FIT return rates. Of 1500 individuals approached, 212 were eligible for the study. The final sample consisted of 209 participants who were predominantly men (57%) and AAs (85%). No differences were found in the return rates by educational brochure (24% [brochure] vs. 23% [no brochure]; p = 0.82). In regard to FIT provision strategy, direct FIT provision yielded higher return rates than indirect provision (31% vs. 15%; p = 0.01). When the four groups were compared, direct provision with education brochure yielded the highest return rates (33.9%), followed by direct provision only (27.5%), indirect provision only (18%), and indirect provision with a brochure (12.2%). For community-based CRC screening intervention using stool-based test, the direct provision of FIT kits with educational brochure outperforms the other three strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Effects of subitems in the colorectal cancer screening protocol on the Chinese colorectal cancer screening program: an analysis based on natural community screening results
    Shan-Rong Cai
    Yan-Qin Huang
    Su-Zhan Zhang
    Qi-Rong Li
    Xin Yuan Ma
    Shu Zheng
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [2] Effects of subitems in the colorectal cancer screening protocol on the Chinese colorectal cancer screening program: an analysis based on natural community screening results
    Cai, Shan-Rong
    Huang, Yan-Qin
    Zhang, Su-Zhan
    Li, Qi-Long
    Ma, Xin Yuan
    Zheng, Shu
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [3] Improving colorectal cancer screening by using community volunteers - Results of the carolinas cancer education and screening (CARES) project
    Katz, Mira L.
    Tatum, Cathy
    Dickinson, Stephanie L.
    Murray, David M.
    Long-Foley, Kristie
    Cooper, M. Robert
    Daven, Morgan
    Paskett, Electra D.
    CANCER, 2007, 110 (07) : 1602 - 1610
  • [4] Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in a peer-counseling intervention study in partnership with African American churches
    Maxwell, Annette E.
    Lucas-Wright, Aziza
    Chang, L. Cindy
    Santifer, Rhonda E.
    Crespi, Catherine M.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2020, 20
  • [5] Engaging the Community on Colorectal Cancer Screening Education: Focus Group Discussions Among African Americans
    Luque, John S.
    Vargas, Matthew
    Wallace, Kristin
    Matthew, Olayemi O.
    Tawk, Rima
    Ali, Askal A.
    Kiros, Gebre-Egziabher
    Harris, Cynthia M.
    Gwede, Clement K.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (02) : 251 - 262
  • [6] Engaging the Community on Colorectal Cancer Screening Education: Focus Group Discussions Among African Americans
    John S. Luque
    Matthew Vargas
    Kristin Wallace
    Olayemi O. Matthew
    Rima Tawk
    Askal A. Ali
    Gebre-Egziabher Kiros
    Cynthia M. Harris
    Clement K. Gwede
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2022, 37 : 251 - 262
  • [7] Social Determinants Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban Community Sample of African-American Men
    Mitchell, Jamie A.
    Watkins, Daphne C.
    Modlin, Charles S., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2013, 10 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [8] Engaging Traditional Medicine Providers in Colorectal Cancer Screening Education in a Chinese American Community: A Pilot Study
    Wang, Jun
    Burke, Adam
    Tsoh, Janice Y.
    Le, Gem M.
    Stewart, Susan
    Gildengorin, Ginny
    Wong, Ching
    Chow, Elaine
    Woo, Kent
    Nguyen, Tung T.
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2014, 11
  • [9] An entertainment-education colorectal cancer screening decision aid for African American patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Hoffman, Aubri S.
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Kamath, Geetanjali R.
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Leal, Viola B.
    Linder, Suzanne K.
    Jibaja-Weiss, Maria L.
    Raju, Gottumukkala S.
    Volk, Robert J.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (08) : 1401 - 1408
  • [10] Improving knowledge of the prostate cancer screening dilemma among African American men: An academic-community partnership in Washington, DC
    Taylor, KL
    Turner, RO
    Davis, JL
    Johnson, L
    Schwartz, MD
    Kerner, J
    Leak, C
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2001, 116 (06) : 590 - 598