Comparison of a dual antibody and antigen HCV immunoassay to standard of care algorithmic testing

被引:0
|
作者
Bui, Tina I. [1 ]
Brown, Abigail P. [1 ]
Brown, Meghan [1 ]
Lawless, Sydney [1 ]
Roemmich, Brittany [1 ]
Anderson, Neil W. [2 ]
Farnsworth, Christopher W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med St Louis, Dept Pathol & Immunol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Univ Hosp Hlth Syst, Dept Pathol, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
hepatitis C; hepatitis C antibody; hepatitis C antigen; immunoassay; diagnostic tests; C VIRUS-INFECTION; HEPATITIS-C; CORE ANTIGEN; GENOTYPE; II ASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; ABT-450/R-OMBITASVIR; DASABUVIR; RIBAVIRIN;
D O I
10.1128/jcm.00832-24
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing, although effective, may miss crucial diagnostic opportunities. The goal of this study was to assess the utility of an antibody (Ab) and antigen (Ag) combination immunoassay as an alternative to traditional HCV screening. Remnant specimens from 1,341 patients with concurrent third-generation serologic (Roche anti-HCV-II) and nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) were assessed using the HCV Duo Ab/Ag immunoassay (Roche). Patient demographics, risk factors, and standard of care (SOC) laboratory results from the medical records were recorded. Overall, 99.0% (197/199) of the HCV Duo Ab+/Ag+specimens accurately identified active infections as confirmed by NAAT, and 99.9% (670/671) Ab-/Ag- samples corresponded to those without HCV infections. Individually, the HCV Duo Ab component demonstrated a 95.6% positive percent agreement (PPA) (95% CI = 93.8-96.9) and 99.1% negative percent agreement (NPA) (98.8-99.6) compared with SOC anti-HCV II Ab assay. The HCV Duo Ag had a 73.5% PPA (67.9-78.4) and 99.8% NPA (99.3-100) with NAAT. Among RNA+ specimens, 73.4% (197/267) were HCV Duo Ag+, and 265/267 (99.3%) were successfully detected on the HCV Duo Ab component. Notably, 5/7 (71.4%) Ab-/RNA +specimens were detected by HCV Duo, which would have been missed by traditional algorithmic testing. Fourth generation HCV Duo Ab/Ag assay demonstrated comparable performance to SOC testing and shortens the diagnostic window but does not eliminate the need for NAAT in all patients. Ab/Ag testing identified several Ab-/RNA+ cases, a subgroup often undiagnosed by current algorithmic testing, demonstrating promise for improved diagnostic efficiency and accuracy in HCV detection.IMPORTANCEThis study highlights the potential of a combined hepatitis C virus (HCV) Duo antibody (Ab) and antigen (Ag) immunoassay to improve early detection of HCV infections. Traditional Ab-only screening methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may miss early-stage infections. The HCV Duo assay showed high accuracy, detecting nearly all active infections confirmed by nucleic acid amplification testing. Dual detection of HCV Ab and Ag shortens the diagnostic window, enabling intervention and treatment in a single visit, which is crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing HCV transmission, especially in areas with limited access to confirmatory molecular testing. This study highlights the potential of a combined hepatitis C virus (HCV) Duo antibody (Ab) and antigen (Ag) immunoassay to improve early detection of HCV infections. Traditional Ab-only screening methods recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may miss early-stage infections. The HCV Duo assay showed high accuracy, detecting nearly all active infections confirmed by nucleic acid amplification testing. Dual detection of HCV Ab and Ag shortens the diagnostic window, enabling intervention and treatment in a single visit, which is crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing HCV transmission, especially in areas with limited access to confirmatory molecular testing.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Elecsys® HCV Duo Assay to Standard of Care Algorithmic Testing
    Bui-Bullock, T.
    Brown, A. P.
    Brown, M.
    Lawless, S.
    Roemmich, B.
    Anderson, N. W.
    Farnsworth, C. W.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 70
  • [2] Comparison of antigen/antibody immobilization methods in immunoassay
    Kao Teng Hsueh Hsiao Hua Heush Hsueh Pao, 5 Suppl (514):
  • [3] Benefits of HCV antigen/antibody testing: A comparison of the new abbott murex hcv Ag/Ab combination assay with antibody only testing and a competitor HCV combination assay
    Burch, J.
    Rodgers, B.
    James, J.
    Napier, N.
    Furzel, E.
    Trencher, H.
    Blinckol, S.
    Trotter, D.
    McBryne, L.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2006, 91 : 47 - 47
  • [4] Dual monoclonal antibody immunoassay for free prostate-specific antigen
    Wang, TJ
    Hill, TM
    Sokoloff, RL
    Frankenne, F
    Rittenhouse, HG
    Wolfert, RL
    PROSTATE, 1996, 28 (01): : 10 - 16
  • [5] COMPARISON OF A POLYCLONAL AND MONOCLONAL IMMUNOASSAY FOR PSA - NEED FOR AN INTERNATIONAL ANTIGEN STANDARD
    GRAVES, HCB
    WEHNER, N
    STAMEY, TA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (06): : 1516 - 1522
  • [6] COMPARISON OF A NEW HCV CORE ANTIGEN AUTOMATED IMMUNOASSAY TO QUANTITATIVE HCV RNA MEASUREMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS C
    Hadziyannis, Emilia
    Vassilopoulos, Dimitrios
    Georgiou, Anastasia
    Spanou, Fotini
    Koskinas, John
    HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 52 (04) : 1230A - 1230A
  • [7] Comparison of antinuclear antibody testing methods: Immunofluorescence assay versus enzyme immunoassay
    Gniewek, RA
    Stites, DP
    McHugh, TM
    Hilton, JF
    Nakagawa, M
    CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 4 (02) : 185 - 188
  • [8] Evaluation of hepatitis C antibody testing in saliva specimens collected by two different systems in comparison with HCV antibody and HCV RNA in serum
    Van Doornum, GJJ
    Lodder, A
    Buimer, M
    Van Ameijden, EJC
    Bruisten, S
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2001, 64 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [9] Trends in HCV RNA Testing Among HCV Antibody-Positive Persons in Care, 2003-2010
    Spradling, Philip R.
    Tong, Xin
    Rupp, Loralee B.
    Moorman, Anne C.
    Lu, Mei
    Teshale, Eyasu H.
    Gordon, Stuart C.
    Vijayadeva, Vinutha
    Boscarino, Joseph A.
    Schmidt, Mark A.
    Holmberg, Scott D.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 59 (07) : 976 - 981
  • [10] A comparison of immunofluorescence (FANA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing.
    Sarakbi, HK
    Goodman, BM
    Bridges, AJ
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2001, 28 : 31 - 31