Measuring quality of life at work for healthcare and social services workers: A systematic review of available instruments

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Liang [1 ]
Toure, Moustapha [2 ]
Poder, Thomas G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Management Evaluat & Hlth Policy, 7101 Pk Ave, Montreal, PQ H3N 1X9, Canada
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Econ, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[3] Ctr Rech IUSMM, CIUSSS Est Ile Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
HEALTH CARE SCIENCE | 2023年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
quality of life; work; healthcare and social services; instruments; systematic review; Quebec;
D O I
10.1002/hcs2.53
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Quality of life at work is an important and widely discussed concept in the literature. Several instruments can be used to measure it, but with regard to healthcare and social services, the existing instruments are not well known. A review of available instruments intending to capture the quality of life of healthcare and social services workers (QoLHSSW) is necessary to better assess their working conditions and promote programs/guidelines to improve these conditions. The aim of this study was to identify the existing instruments used in measuring QoLHSSW and explore their characteristics. Particular attention was given to instruments adapted to the province of Quebec, Canada, which enabled the determination of which instruments are adapted for the measurement of QoLHSSW in Quebec and possibly elsewhere. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the JBI methodological guide. The articles' selection procedure was performed according to the PRISMA flowchart. The search was conducted up to October 28, 2021, and then updated on January 25, 2023, in four databases: PsycINFO, Medline, Embase, and CINAHL. The selection and extraction were performed independently by two researchers. The analysis of the quality of the studies was performed with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments. From a total of 8178 entries, 13 articles corresponding to 13 instruments were selected. Among these instruments, the common aspects that were considered were work conditions, job satisfaction, stress at work, relationship/balance, and career development. Most instruments used a 5-point Likert scale. Various validation methods were used, including reporting Cronbach's alpha for overall scale reliability; factor analysis to test construct validity; different model fit indices to test model superiority; different language comparisons to test cross-cultural validity; and qualitative expert reviews to assess content validity. Quality of life at work is an important and widely discussed concept in the literature. Several instruments can be used to measure it, but with regard to healthcare and social services, the existing instruments are not well known. A review of available instruments intended to capture the quality of life of healthcare and social services workers is necessary to better assess their working conditions and promote programs/guidelines to improve these conditions. image
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 193
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring quality of life in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review of reliable and valid instruments available in Japan
    Okamoto T.
    Shimozuma K.
    AKatsumota N.
    Koike M.
    Hisashige A.
    Tanaka K.
    Ohsumi S.
    Saito M.
    Shikama N.
    Mitsumori M.
    Yamauchi C.
    Watanabe T.
    [J]. Breast Cancer, 2003, 10 (3) : 204 - 213
  • [2] Work Ability and Quality of Life for Healthcare Workers
    Suen, Mein-Woei
    Chiu, Min-Chi
    Wang, Jui-Hsing
    [J]. CONFERENCE ON PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL HARMONY (CPSH2011), 2011, : 76 - +
  • [3] Psychometric evaluation of instruments measuring the work environment of healthcare professionals in hospitals: a systematic literature review
    Maassen, Susanne M.
    Jansen, Anne Marie J. W. Weggelaar
    Brekelmans, Gerard
    Vermeulen, Hester
    van Oostveen, Catharina J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 32 (08) : 545 - 557
  • [4] Measuring Instruments for Empowerment in Social Work: A Scoping Review
    Noordink, Thomas
    Verharen, Lisbeth
    Schalk, Rene
    van Eck, Marcel
    van Regenmortel, Tine
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2021, 51 (04): : 1482 - 1508
  • [5] Measuring relational aggression in children and adolescents: A systematic review of the available instruments
    Voulgaridou, Ioanna
    Kokkinos, Constantinos M.
    [J]. AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2019, 46 : 82 - 97
  • [6] Quality of Work Life and Burnout in Healthcare Workers in Turkey
    Saygili, Meltem
    Avci, Keziban
    Sonmez, Seda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2020, 22 (03) : 317 - 329
  • [7] Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
    Strada, Lisa
    Vanderplasschen, Wouter
    Buchholz, Angela
    Schulte, Bernd
    Muller, Ashley E.
    Verthein, Uwe
    Reimer, Jens
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (12) : 3187 - 3200
  • [8] Measuring quality of life in opioid-dependent people: a systematic review of assessment instruments
    Lisa Strada
    Wouter Vanderplasschen
    Angela Buchholz
    Bernd Schulte
    Ashley E. Muller
    Uwe Verthein
    Jens Reimer
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 3187 - 3200
  • [9] Measuring quality of life in patients with abdominal wall hernias: a systematic review of available tools
    T. N. Grove
    L. J. Muirhead
    S. G. Parker
    D. R. L. Brogden
    S. C. Mills
    C. Kontovounisios
    A. C. J. Windsor
    O. J. Warren
    [J]. Hernia, 2021, 25 : 491 - 500
  • [10] Measuring quality of life in patients with abdominal wall hernias: a systematic review of available tools
    Grove, T. N.
    Muirhead, L. J.
    Parker, S. G.
    Brogden, D. R. L.
    Mills, S. C.
    Kontovounisios, C.
    Windsor, A. C. J.
    Warren, O. J.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2021, 25 (02) : 491 - 500