共 50 条
Trends and factors associated with receipt of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in private, public, and alternative settings in the United States
被引:0
|作者:
White, Melissa C.
[1
]
Osazuwa-Peters, Oyomoare L.
[2
]
Abouelella, Dina K.
[3
]
Barnes, Justin M.
[4
]
Cannon, Trinitia Y.
[3
,5
]
Watts, Tammara L.
[3
,5
]
Boakye, Eric Adjei
[6
,7
]
Osazuwa- Peters, Nosayaba
[2
,3
,5
]
机构:
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Head & Neck Surg & Commun Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Duke Univ, Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[6] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Detroit, MI USA
[7] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Detroit, MI USA
来源:
关键词:
PREVENTION;
SURVIVAL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.06.004
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: One of the goals of the President's Cancer Panel was to maximize access to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination through expansion of alternative settings for receiving the vaccine, such as in public health settings, schools, and pharmacies. Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis, we utilized the National Immunization Survey-Teen data from 2014 to 2020 (n n = 74,645) to describe trends and associated with HPV vaccine uptake in private, public, and alternative settings. We calculated annual percent change (APC) between 2014 and 2020, estimating of HPV vaccine uptake across settings. Using multinomial logistic regression, we estimated the odds of receipt of HPV vaccine in public health settings and alternative settings compared to private healthcare settings, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. Results: We found a 5 % annual increase in the use of private facilities between 2014-2018 (APC = 5.3; 95 % CI 3.4, 7.1), and almost 7 % between 2018-2020 = 6.7; 95 % CI 1.4, 12.3). Adjusted multinomial logistic regression analyses found that odds of receiving vaccinations at a public facility vs. a private increased almost two times for adolescents living below poverty (aOR = 1.82, 95 % CI: 1.60, 2.08) compared to above poverty. Additionally, adolescents without physician recommendations had lower odds of receiving vaccines at public versus private facilities (aOR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.44, 2.12). Finally, odds of receiving vaccines at public facilities vs. private facilities decreased by 33 % for White adolescents (aOR = 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.57, 0.78) versus Black adolescents. Conclusions: Sociodemographic factors such as race, and socioeconomic factors such as poverty level, and receipt of physician HPV recommendations are associated with receiving the vaccine at private settings vs. public health facilities and alternative settings. This information is important in strengthening alternative settings HPV vaccine uptake to increase access to the vaccine among disadvantaged individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文