Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery is Safe and Effective in People with Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:2
|
作者
Cohen, Ricardo V. [1 ]
Azevedo, Mauricio A. [2 ]
Le Roux, Carel W. [3 ]
Caldeon, Lorraine P. M. L. P. [2 ]
Luque, Alexandre [2 ]
Fayad, Dhiego A. [2 ]
Petry, Tarissa B. Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Alemao Oswaldo Cruz, Ctr Obes & Diabet, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Obesity; Type; 2; Diabetes; Chronic kidney disease; Diabetic kidney disease; Metabolic surgery; Bariatric surgery; Y GASTRIC BYPASS; LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; INTENSIVE MEDICAL-MANAGEMENT; SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; BARIATRIC SURGERY; SINGLE-CENTER; FOLLOW-UP; METABOLIC SURGERY; WEIGHT-LOSS; OPEN-LABEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-024-07535-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are thought to increase surgical risks and reduce weight loss after metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS). Electronic databases were searched between January 2013 and August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MBS reporting data on the safety, total weight loss (TWL), and metabolic control in patients with and without CKD. Forty-four out of 2904 articles were analyzed, representing 1470 patients. No significant differences were found in TWL after 1 year (- 19%, CI - 0.19 to - 0.18 vs.: - 15%, CI - 0.20 to - 0.09, p = 0.13) or after 5 years (- 20%, CI - 0.21 to - 0.18 vs. Group - 16%, CI - 0.28 to - 0.04, p = 0.50).Similarly, there were no significant differences in HbA1c at 1 year (- 1.06, CI - 1.37 to - 0.76 vs. Group 2: - 1.52, CI - 2.25 to - 0.79, p = 0.26) or after 5 years (- 0.97, CI - 1.53 to 0.41 vs. Group 2: - 1.09, CI - 2.21 to 0.03, p = 0.85). For fasting plasma glucose, no differences were seen at 2 years (- 30.43, CI - 60.47 to 0.39 vs. - 35.11, CI - 48.76 to - 21.46, p = 0.78) or after 5 years (- 11.24, CI - 53.38 to 30.89 vs. - 5.4, CI 20.22 to 9.42, p = 0.80). In terms of total cholesterol, no significant differences were found after 1 year (- 10.36, CI - 32.94 to 12.22 vs. - 19.80, CI - 39.46 to - 0.14, p = 0.54) or after 5 years (- 7.43, CI - 25.09 to 5.23 vs. - 21.30, CI - 43.08 to 0.49, p = 0.15). For triglycerides, both showed similar reductions after 1 year (- 76.21, CI - 112.84 to - 39.59 vs. - 78.00, CI - 100.47 to - 55.53, p = 0.94) and after 5 years (- 79.65, CI - 121.09 to - 38.21 vs. - 53.15, CI - 71.14 to - 35.16, p = 0.25). The presence of CKD in patients with obesity and T2D does not reduce the safety and efficacy of MBS.
引用
收藏
页码:4097 / 4105
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of drugs for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Qing
    Lang, Yanlin
    Yang, Wenjie
    Yang, Fenghao
    Yang, Jia
    Wu, Yucheng
    Xiao, Xiang
    Qin, Chunmei
    Zou, Yutong
    Zhao, Yuancheng
    Kang, Deying
    Liu, Fang
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 198
  • [2] Tumor risks of finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Du, Yue
    Cao, Gui
    Gu, Linlin
    Chen, Yuehong
    Liu, Jingyu
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [3] Acupuncture for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Chao
    Liu, Jia
    Sun, Mengxiao
    Liu, Weihong
    Han, Juan
    Wang, Hongcai
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 36 : 100 - 112
  • [4] Silymarin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Voroneanu, Luminita
    Nistor, Ionut
    Dumea, Raluca
    Apetrii, Mugurel
    Covic, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES RESEARCH, 2016, 2016
  • [5] The Impact of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery on Diabetic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Einafshar, Negar
    Esparham, Ali
    Moghani, Mahta Shari'at
    Radboy, Mahsa
    Ghamari, Mohammad Javad
    Zandbaf, Tooraj
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2025, 35 (01) : 329 - 340
  • [6] Acupuncture in treating obesity combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Wang, Ying
    Xu, Guang-nan
    Wan, Ren-hong
    Zhou, Xin
    Ma, Li-ying
    Liu, Bing
    Zhang, Yu-yan
    Zhou, Liang
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 49
  • [7] Baduanjin Exercise for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wen, Junmao
    Lin, Tong
    Cai, Yinhe
    Chen, Qianying
    Chen, Yuexuan
    Ren, Yueyi
    Weng, Senhui
    Wang, Boqing
    Ji, Shuliang
    Wu, Wei
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 2017
  • [8] Metabolic bariatric surgery as a therapeutic option for patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    De Luca, Maurizio
    Zese, Monica
    Bandini, Giulia
    Chiappetta, Sonja
    Iossa, Angelo
    Merola, Giovanni
    Piatto, Giacomo
    Tolone, Salvatore
    Vitiello, Antonio
    Silverii, Giovanni Antonio
    Ragghianti, Benedetta
    Mannucci, Edoardo
    Monami, Matteo
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2023, 25 (08): : 2362 - 2373
  • [9] Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery Versus Medical Management for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Khorgami, Zhamak
    Shoar, Saeed
    Saber, Alan A.
    Howard, C. Anthony
    Danaei, Goodarz
    Sclabas, Guido M.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 (03) : 964 - 974
  • [10] Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery Versus Medical Management for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhamak Khorgami
    Saeed Shoar
    Alan A. Saber
    C. Anthony Howard
    Goodarz Danaei
    Guido M. Sclabas
    Obesity Surgery, 2019, 29 : 964 - 974