The Role of Executive Function in Cognitive Reappraisal: A Meta-Analytic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Toh, Wei Xing [1 ]
Keh, Jun Sheng [2 ]
Gross, James J. [3 ]
Carstensen, Laura L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Social Sci, Div Psychol, 48 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639818, Singapore
[2] Singapore Management Univ, Sch Social Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
reappraisal; emotion regulation; executive functions; meta-analysis; ROBUST VARIANCE-ESTIMATION; EMOTION-REGULATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; WORKING-MEMORY; EXPRESSIVE SUPPRESSION; AGE-DIFFERENCES; PROCESS MODEL; SELF-CONTROL; DEPRESSION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1037/emo0001373
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Cognitive reappraisal refers to the reinterpretation of a situation to alter its emotional meaning. Theoretically, executive functions (EFs), such as inhibition, updating, and shifting, are core elements of reappraisal processes. However, empirical studies have yielded inconsistent evidence as to whether and to what extent EFs are associated with reappraisal. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of the literature in which 179 effect sizes from 59 independent samples (N = 4,703) were included. Using random-effects metaregression with robust-variance estimates and small-sample corrections, we also examined whether variation in effect sizes could be accounted for by potential moderators, such as the way reappraisal was assessed (i.e., questionnaires vs. task-based measures) and the type of stimuli used in EF tasks (i.e., affective vs. nonaffective). Overall, results indicate relatively small to typical associations between reappraisal and all three EFs (rs = .13-.19). While the way reappraisal was measured did not moderate any of the relations between EF and reappraisal, we found stronger relations between inhibition and reappraisal when EF was assessed using tasks that involved affective, relative to nonaffective, stimuli. Our meta-analytic findings offer modest support for the idea that EFs are cognitive constituents of reappraisal processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1563 / 1581
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review
    Alvarez, Julie A.
    Emory, Eugene
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 16 (01) : 17 - 42
  • [2] Executive Function and the Frontal Lobes: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Julie A. Alvarez
    Eugene Emory
    [J]. Neuropsychology Review, 2006, 16 : 17 - 42
  • [3] Executive Function and Reading Comprehension: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Follmer, D. Jake
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 53 (01) : 42 - 60
  • [4] Executive Function in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Vincent, Corita
    Hall, Peter A.
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2015, 77 (06) : 631 - 642
  • [5] A meta-analytic review of social cognitive function following stroke
    Adams, Alexandra G.
    Schweitzer, Daniel
    Molenberghs, Pascal
    Henry, Julie D.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2019, 102 : 400 - 416
  • [6] Executive functioning in adult ADHD: a meta-analytic review
    Boonstra, AM
    Oosterlaan, J
    Sergeant, JA
    Buitelaar, JK
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2005, 35 (08) : 1097 - 1108
  • [7] A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function
    Morgan, AB
    Lilienfeld, SO
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2000, 20 (01) : 113 - 136
  • [8] The association between allostatic load and cognitive function: A systematic and meta-analytic review
    D'Amico, Danielle
    Amestoy, Maya E.
    Fiocco, Alexandra J.
    [J]. PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 121
  • [9] The association between allostatic load and cognitive function: A systematic and meta-analytic review
    D'Amico, Danielle
    Amestoy, Maya E.
    Fiocco, Alexandra J.
    [J]. PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 119 : S8 - S8
  • [10] A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF OLFACTORY FUNCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA
    Moberg, Paul Joseph
    Marchetto, D.
    Liapis, Z.
    Kamath, V.
    Borgmann-Winter, K.
    Turetsky, B.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2009, 35 : 254 - 255