Displaced humeral shaft fractures: Assessment of fracture union and complications following dual plate fixation using an anterior approach

被引:0
|
作者
Nallet, Jeremie [1 ,2 ]
Menez, Clement [1 ,2 ]
Loisel, Francois [1 ,2 ]
Rochet, Severin [1 ,2 ]
Lepage, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Obert, Laurent [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Franche Comte, Orthopaed Traumatol Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Sch Med, F-25000 Besancon, France
[2] Univ Hosp Besancon, UR 4662, LNIT, F-25000 Besancon, France
关键词
Humeral shaft fracture; Open reduction and internal fixation; Dual locking plate compression; DYNAMIC COMPRESSION PLATE; INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL; DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2024.111344
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The humeral bone is subject to torsional forces. In case of displaced shaft fractures, internal fixation remains the standard of care. This retrospective two-center study assessed the fracture union rate and complications after dual 3.5 mm locking compression plate (LCP) fixation using an anterolateral approach. Over a 9-year period, 38 patients underwent surgery in two centers. They had a mean age of 53.7 years (15-97, +/- standard deviation (SD) 26) and there were three open fracture cases (7.9 %). The dominant side was affected in 21 cases (55.3 %) and there were 11 polytrauma patients (29 %). Mean operative time was 78 min (40-124, +/- 19.8 SD). Patients were treated with dual 3.5 mm LCP fixation (6 screws on either side of the fracture line, anterolateral approach without a tourniquet). The first two orthogonal views showing at least 3 cortical bridges out of 4 determined fracture healing, as assessed by two independent raters. Pre- and postoperative complications were tabulated. Clinical outcomes included range of motion (ROM) and return to activities, while functional outcomes were assessed with the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Constant score, the Subjective Shoulder Score (SSV) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Four patients were given a shoulder immobilizer to wear for 3 weeks; immediate mobilization was the standard of care for the other patients. Fracture union was achieved in all cases within a mean of 11.7 weeks (6-28 +/- 7.1 SD) without any heterotopic ossification of the brachialis muscle. There were eight patients with preoperative radial nerve palsy and two cases of postoperative palsy. There was one surgical site infection (2.6 %). Return to work for active patients was possible in 87 % of cases within a mean of 23 weeks (6-72 +/- 11 SD). The Constant score was 84.6 (35-100, +/- 13.4 SD), the SSV score was 80.7 (60-100, +/- 8.2 SD), the DASH score was 13.5 (0-38.3, +/- 8.8 SD) and the MEPS score was 85 (55-100, +/- 11.9 SD). Traditional fixation methods provide little control over torsional forces, leading to non-union rates between 3 % and 12 % and delayed union (12 to 20 weeks). The simplicity of the technique described here, and the short operative time, may help explain the low infection rate. Dual plate fixation makes it possible to use more screws and allows nerve exploration and decompression in case of preoperative nerve palsy. Dual plate fixation to treat humeral shaft fractures is a simple and reliable technique.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Functional outcome and complications following PHILOS plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures
    Geiger, Emanuel V.
    Maier, Marcus
    Kelm, Arne
    Wutzler, Sebastian
    Seebach, Caroline
    Marzi, Ingo
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2010, 44 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [2] Prediction of humeral shaft fracture healing using the Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral Fractures (RUSHU)
    Suter, C.
    Mattila, H.
    Ibounig, T.
    Sumrein, B. O.
    Launonen, A.
    Jarvinen, T. L. N.
    Lahdeoja, T.
    Ramo, L.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (11): : 962 - 970
  • [3] LCP metaphyseal plate fixation for fractures of the distal third humeral shaft using brachialis splitting approach
    Lee, Sang Ki
    Yang, Dae Suk
    Chang, Shann Haw
    Choy, Won Sik
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2016, 82 (01): : 85 - 93
  • [4] Dual plating for fixation of humeral shaft fractures: A mechanical comparison of various combinations of plate lengths
    Karakasli, Ahmet
    Basci, Onur
    Ertem, Fatih
    Sekik, Eyad
    Havitcioglu, Hasan
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2016, 50 (04) : 432 - 436
  • [5] The clinical outcomes of anterior minimally invasive inverted PHILOS plate fixation for distal humeral shaft fractures
    Fu, Gang
    Wang, Shen'ao
    Wu, Weiqiang
    Lin, Fengfei
    Li, Renbin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [6] Reoperation following open reduction and plate fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures
    Ashman, Bradley D.
    Slobogean, Gerard P.
    Stone, Trevor B.
    Viskontas, Darius G.
    Moola, Farhad O.
    Perey, Bertrand H.
    Boyer, Dory S.
    McCormack, Robert G.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2014, 45 (10): : 1549 - 1553
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Technique to Aid Fracture Reduction and Minimize Complications
    Shin, Sang-Jin
    Sohn, Hoon-Sang
    Do, Nam-Hoon
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2012, 26 (10) : 585 - 589
  • [8] Union Rate and Rate of Hardware Removal Following Plate Fixation of Metatarsal Shaft and Neck Fractures
    Bryant, Tony
    Beck, David M.
    Daniel, Joseph N.
    Pedowitz, David I.
    Raikin, Steven M.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 39 (03) : 326 - 331
  • [9] Complications and morbidity of the extended delto-pectoral approach in treating complex humeral shaft fractures with proximal metaphyseal extension using a long locking plate for internal fixation
    Rechsteiner, Jan
    Grieb, Maximilian
    Zdravkovic, Vilijam
    Spross, Christian
    Jost, Bernhard
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [10] MANAGEMENT OF FRACTURES AND FRACTURE COMPLICATIONS OF FEMORAL-SHAFT USING ASIF COMPRESSION PLATE
    ROBERTS, JB
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1977, 17 (01): : 20 - 28