Ask your peer! How requests for peer feedback affect peer feedback responses

被引:0
|
作者
van Blankenstein, Floris M. [1 ]
Dirkx, Kim J. H. [2 ]
de Bruycker, Nathalie M. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Ctr Innovat Med Educ, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Zuyd Univ Appl Sci, Educ & Res Serv, Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Feedback-seeking; feedback requests; peer feedback; peer review; online learning; academic writing; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; HIGHER-EDUCATION; STUDENTS; QUALITY; SEEKING; WRITTEN; KNOWLEDGE; DIALOGUE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/13803611.2024.2376832
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Peer feedback can be an effective learning aid. However, providing peer feedback so that it is used by the receiver, is very difficult. Adding feedback requests to the peer feedback process may improve the quality of peer feedback. However, little is known about how feedback requests affect peer feedback responses. In this study, fifty-four students in two master programs asked each other feedback on their thesis and in return, provided peer feedback. Their feedback requests were related predominantly to global-level (versus local-level) text issues. Peers' responses to the requests contained significantly more global-level positive evaluation, explanation and feedback aimed at content and style than additionally provided peer feedback. However, their responses did not contain significantly more global-level suggestions. Global-level, explained feedback is a sign for high-quality feedback. Therefore, adding feedback requests improves the quality of peer feedback. Still, students should also be trained to respond with global-level suggestions for improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
    Melissa M. Nelson
    Christian D. Schunn
    [J]. Instructional Science, 2009, 37 : 375 - 401
  • [2] The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
    Nelson, Melissa M.
    Schunn, Christian D.
    [J]. INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (04) : 375 - 401
  • [3] Peer feedback
    Gallant, Alexandra
    Erdman, Laura
    Mcbeth, Lauren
    Ngov, Li-Kheng
    Misky, Gregory
    [J]. JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2024, 37 (03): : 2 - 4
  • [4] Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students' peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance
    Huisman, Bart
    Saab, Nadira
    van Driel, Jan
    van den Broek, Paul
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (06) : 955 - 968
  • [5] Peer feedback in higher education: How students' roles affect providing and receiving feedback
    Stancic, Milan
    Milin, Vladeta
    Gasic, Andrea
    [J]. STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2024, 83
  • [6] PEER FEEDBACK MARKING - DEVELOPING PEER ASSESSMENT
    FALCHIKOV, N
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 32 (02): : 175 - 187
  • [7] Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment
    Liu, Ngar-Fun
    Carless, David
    [J]. TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 11 (03) : 279 - 290
  • [8] Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback
    Zong, Zheng
    Schunn, Christian D.
    Wang, Yanqing
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (06) : 973 - 992
  • [9] An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading
    Panadero, Ernesto
    Alqassab, Maryam
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (08) : 1253 - 1278
  • [10] Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback
    Strickland, N. H.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (11) : 1158 - 1164