Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kose, Halil Cihan [1 ]
Kose, Selin Guven [1 ]
Celikel, Feyza [2 ]
Tulgar, Serkan [3 ]
Akkaya, Omer Taylan [4 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ, Kocaeli City Hosp, Dept Pain Med, TR-41060 Kocaeli, Turkiye
[2] Sakarya Training & Res Hosp, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil, TR-54120 Sakarya, Turkiye
[3] Samsun Univ, Samsun Training & Res Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, TR-41060 Samsun, Turkiye
[4] Ankara Etlik City Hosp, Dept Pain Med, TR-06170 Ankara, Turkiye
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
selective nerve root block; chronic pain; radicular pain; ultrasound; cervical radiculopathy; steroid; numeric rating scale; STEROID INJECTION; DISC HERNIATION; RADICULOPATHY; INFARCTION; SPREAD; SPINE;
D O I
10.3390/jpm14070721
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Ultrasound (US)-guided cervical selective nerve root block (CSNRB) procedures are increasingly being performed as an alternative to conventional fluoroscopy (FL)-guided epidural injections for the treatment of cervical radicular pain. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of US-guided CSNRB versus FL-guided interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection (IL-CESI) for cervical radicular pain. A total of 60 patients with cervical radicular pain due to a single-level disc herniation were randomized into either the FL or US group. The numeric rating scale, Short Form-36, and neck disability index were evaluated before treatment at months 1, 3, and 6 after treatment. Procedure time, complications, pain medication consumption, and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Patients experienced significant improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life scores up to 6 months after the procedure (p < 0.001). Treatment success rate was achieved in 56.6% of the IL-CESI group and 50% of the CSNRB group without any significant difference between the study arms (p = 0.617). US-guided CSNRB was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided IL-CESI in the treatment of cervical radicular pain, in addition to the absence of radiation exposure and requiring less procedure time.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Jang, Jin Hyuk
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Kim, Jong Woo
    Cho, Kyoung Rai
    Nam, Sang Hyun
    Park, YongBum
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 2020
  • [2] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study
    Ki Deok Park
    Woo Yong Lee
    Sang Hyun Nam
    Myounghwan Kim
    Yongbum Park
    Journal of Ultrasound, 2019, 22 : 167 - 177
  • [3] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study
    Park, Ki Deok
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Nam, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Myounghwan
    Park, Yongbum
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, 2019, 22 (02) : 167 - 177
  • [4] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A randomized, blinded, controlled study
    Jee, Haemi
    Lee, Ji Hae
    Kim, Jongwoo
    Park, Ki Deok
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Park, Yongbum
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [5] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A randomized, blinded, controlled study
    Haemi Jee
    Ji Hae Lee
    Jongwoo Kim
    Ki Deok Park
    Woo Yong Lee
    Yongbum Park
    Skeletal Radiology, 2013, 42 : 69 - 78
  • [6] Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of cervical nerve root for cervical radicular pain: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Chalermkitpanit, Pornpan
    Pannangpetch, Patt
    Kositworakitkun, Yuwarin
    Singhatanadgige, Weerasak
    Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
    Pasuhirunnikorn, Porntipa
    Tanasansomboon, Teerachat
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (05): : 651 - 655
  • [7] Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block A Fluoroscopy-Controlled Feasibility Study
    Narouze, Samer N.
    Vydyanathan, Amaresh
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Mekhail, Nagy
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 34 (04) : 343 - 348
  • [8] Ultrasound-guided and CT-guided selective cervical nerve root injection for the treatment of cervical radicular pain: A retrospective clinical study
    Bing, Ran
    Li, Wenting
    Rong, Chen
    Song, Chanchan
    Xin, Deng
    Jun, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2024, 52 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [9] Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided lumbar selective nerve root block: a retrospective comparative study
    Bowen Wang
    Yang Sun
    Jitao Zhang
    Hailan Meng
    Hong Zhang
    Lequn Shan
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [10] Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided lumbar selective nerve root block: a retrospective comparative study
    Wang, Bowen
    Sun, Yang
    Zhang, Jitao
    Meng, Hailan
    Zhang, Hong
    Shan, Lequn
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)