Effect of sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer compared to single cleavage stage embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome: An RCT

被引:0
|
作者
Homayoon, Nahid [1 ]
Arabian, Sahereh [2 ]
Mangoli, Esmat [3 ]
Bayati, Fatemeh [4 ]
Eftekhar, Maryam [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Yazd Reprod Sci Inst, Res & Clin Ctr Infertil, Yazd, Iran
[2] Semnan Univ Med Sci, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Res Ctr, Semnan, Iran
[3] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Res & Clin Ctr Infertil, Dept Reprod Biol, Yazd, Iran
[4] Shahrekord Univ Med Sci, Hajar Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clin Res Dev Unit, Shahrekord, Iran
关键词
Blastocyst transfer; In vitro fertilization; Embryo transfer; IMPLANTATION FAILURE;
D O I
10.18502/ijrm.v22i6.16793
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Assisted reproductive technology (ART), offers hope for many infertile couples by increasing the chance of successful pregnancy. The success of in vitro fertilization depends on various factors, in which embryo transfer (ET) is one of the critical steps influencing in vitro fertilization success rates. Extended embryo culture and blastocyst-stage ET have been considered in ART due to their potential benefits including improved implantation rates. Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of sequential ET vs single cleavage-stage ET in women undergoing a fresh ET cycle with a limited number of embryos. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 140 women undergoing infertility treatments and candidates for fresh ET at the Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd, Iran from August 2023 to January 2024. Women with a number of embryos from 2-5 (>= >= 2 and <= 5 available embryos) were randomly divided into 2 groups: One group underwent sequential ET (one cleavage-stage ET followed by one blastocyst ET) and the other group underwent single-step 2 cleavage-stage ET. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy, and the secondary outcome included chemical pregnancy and early abortion rates. Results: Our findings showed significantly higher rates of clinical (33.5% vs 13.6%, p = 0.003) and chemical (41.3% vs 18.2%, p = 0.004) pregnancies in the sequential ET group compared to the single-step cleavage ET group. The early abortion rate was higher in single-step cleavage ET (13% vs 44.4%, p = 0.053). Conclusion: Sequential fresh ET is a useful choice in women who have a limited number of embryos and can improve ART outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 440
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demin
    Farquhar, Cindy
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Blake, Deborah
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (06):
  • [2] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Blake, Debbie
    Farquhar, Cindy
    Bardach, Ariel
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (07):
  • [3] Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Cornelisse, Simone
    Blake, Deborah
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05):
  • [4] Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer
    Schwärzler, P
    Zech, H
    Auer, M
    Pfau, K
    Göbel, G
    Vanderzwalmen, P
    Zech, N
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (09) : 2097 - 2102
  • [5] Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer
    Montag, M
    van der Ven, H
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (06) : 1746 - 1747
  • [6] Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer - Reply
    Auer, M
    Schwaerzler, P
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (06) : 1747 - 1748
  • [7] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception
    Blake, D. A.
    Farquhar, C. M.
    Johnson, N.
    Proctor, M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (04):
  • [8] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception
    Blake, D.
    Proctor, M.
    Johnson, N.
    Olive, D.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (04):
  • [9] Blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer?
    Johnson, Neil
    Blake, Debbie
    Farquhar, Cindy
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [10] Single pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer: Comparison with cleavage stage embryo transfers
    Martin, L.
    Frapsauce, C.
    Royere, D.
    Guerif, F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2012, 40 (05): : 291 - 295