CSR disclosure quantity to CSR disclosure quality - in pursuit of a disclosure quality index

被引:0
|
作者
Hameed, Faisal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wilmshurst, Trevor [1 ]
Horner, Claire [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Hobart, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Int Pathway Coll, Hobart, Australia
[3] UP Educ Ltd, Hobart, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Hobart, Australia
关键词
CSR disclosure quality; CSR disclosure quality index; Qualitative characteristics; Essential characteristics; Enhancing characteristics; CSR disclosure frameworks and standards; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; VOLUNTARY ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE; TRIPLE BOTTOM-LINE; SUSTAINABILITY REPORTS; FIRM VALUE; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; REPORTING PRACTICES; PERFORMANCE; UK; LEGITIMACY;
D O I
10.1108/PAR-11-2023-0161
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeStudies in corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure were initially focused more on disclosure "Quantity" than "Quality" and while they have started to explore "Disclosure Quality", their assessment mechanisms are found to be immature. Thus, while a number of papers have sought to assess the quality of CSR disclosure, this paper aims to suggest an approach tied closely to both expectations in assessing "quality" derived from the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (revised 2018) and the global reporting initiative. The outcome is to offer a best practice approach to assessing CSR disclosure quality.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, prior literature is reviewed, qualitative characteristics from the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (revised 2018) and globally recognised guidelines such as the GRI are reviewed. The framework for a "CSR disclosure quality index" as an assessment tool to assess CSR disclosure quality is developed from qualitative characteristics and criteria identified.FindingsThe proposed CSR disclosure quality index is developed in stages from the qualitative characteristics identified in the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (revised 2018) and criteria identified from the guidelines discussed. A table was then developed linking the qualitative characteristics to criteria providing a Likert scale approach to assessing the disclosures made by companies to make an assessment of the quality of the companies' reports. It is argued this provides a robust assessment, being a direct and comprehensive measure of disclosure quality.Research limitations/implicationsAs with most qualitative work, there are alternative approaches to establishing an index, but the authors believe this is an approach offering links (and, therefore, credibility) to globally recognised guidelines in the assessment of CSR disclosure quality. Future work could enhance the alignment of this index with the sustainable development goals (SDGs), building on the preliminary connections established in this study.Practical implicationsAt a practical level this index offers an approach to reviewing the quality of CSR disclosures which could prove useful to policymakers and in the future development and expansion of this framework offering greater objectivity to assessments and justification for proposed improvement in reporting practice. Also, this index serves as a benchmarking tool for companies to meet the disclosure expectations of stakeholders.Social implicationsThis approach has the potential to substantially fulfil stakeholder expectations by addressing the growing demand for transparency in this area, while avoiding practices that could be perceived as superficial or misleading (greenwashing). Focusing on social issues enables stronger connections between companies and their stakeholders. Furthermore, the index helps companies link their CSR efforts with SDGs and show their commitment to long-term social value building in discussion of governance factors to show accountability expectations are being met.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to CSR disclosure quality literature and provides a reliable method of assessing the quality of CSR disclosures. Opportunities for further and broader developments can be envisaged while offering a credible and reliable approach.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis
    Michelon, Giovanna
    Pilonato, Silvia
    Ricceri, Federica
    [J]. CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2015, 33 : 59 - 78
  • [2] CSR Reports, CSR Disclosure Quality, and Corporate Reputations: A Systematic Literature Review
    Usman, Berto
    [J]. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 4 (01) : 28 - 55
  • [3] The link between CSR performance and CSR disclosure quality: does board diversity matter?
    Cormier, Denis
    Gutierrez, Luania
    Magnan, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, 2024, 28 (01): : 237 - 263
  • [4] The link between CSR performance and CSR disclosure quality: does board diversity matter?
    Denis Cormier
    Luania Gutierrez
    Michel Magnan
    [J]. Journal of Management and Governance, 2024, 28 : 237 - 263
  • [5] CSR Reporting Practices in Visegrad Group Countries and the Quality of Disclosure
    Habek, Patrycja
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (12)
  • [6] Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: evidence from Pakistan
    Khan, Imran
    Khan, Ismail
    Senturk, Ismail
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 19 (06): : 1187 - 1203
  • [7] Defining CSR disclosure quality: a review and synthesis of the accounting literature
    Stuart, Andrew C.
    Fuller, Stephen H.
    Heron, Nicole M.
    Riley, Tracey J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING LITERATURE, 2023, 45 (01) : 1 - 47
  • [8] How and When Does Mandatory CSR Disclosure Affects Firms' CSR Disclosure Strategy?
    Zhang, Zhe
    Chen, Jing
    Jia, Ming
    [J]. MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2023, 19 (01) : 64 - 97
  • [9] CSR Disclosure: The IPO Case
    Arenas-Parra, Mar
    Alvarez-Otero, Susana
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [10] Disclosure for whom? Government involvement, CSR disclosure and firm value
    Xu, Shen
    Chen, Xia
    Li, Antai
    Xia, Xinping
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2020, 44