Continuity of care in general practice in Norway

被引:0
|
作者
Delalic, Lamija [1 ]
Grosland, Mari [1 ]
Godager, Geir [2 ,3 ]
Oien, Henning [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Hlth Management & Hlth Econ, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Oslo, Norway
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0305164
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Aims Maintaining continuity of care between doctors and patients is considered a fundamental aspect of quality in primary healthcare. In this study, we aim to examine continuity in Norway over time by computing two commonly used indicators of continuity: the St Leonard's Index of Continuity of Care (SLICC) and the Usual Provider of Care Index (UPC).Method We employ individual-level data, which covers all primary care consultations. This data includes the identities of each patient and physician, and we can identify each patient's regular general practitioner (GP). The SLICC is calculated as the share of consultations conducted by the patient's regular GP annually from 2006 to 2021. Additionally, we identify each patient's most visited physician and compute the UPC as the share of total consultations conducted by the most visited physician during the same period. Our analysis is conducted at the national level and stratified according to the level of centrality, differentiating between areas of high, moderate, and low centrality.Results Our findings reveal that, at the national level, SLICC and UPC exhibit remarkable stability, reaching 64 and 71 percent, respectively, in 2021. However, there is significant geographical variation, with the least central areas experiencing less continuous healthcare (SLICC at 49 percent in 2021) than patients residing in more central areas (SLICC at 68 in 2021).Conclusion Our results demonstrate a high degree of continuity that has been stable over time. However, large geographical variations suggest that policymakers should strive to reduce geographical disparities in healthcare quality.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Continuity of care in general practice
    Arnold, PC
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 177 (08) : 463 - 463
  • [2] Continuity in general practice - Continuity of care is not all or nothing
    Rose, P
    Bateman, K
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7288): : 737 - 737
  • [3] CONTINUITY OF CARE IN GENERAL PRACTICE Policy makers need to strengthen continuity of care
    Sayers, Luke
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [4] CONTINUITY OF CARE IN GENERAL PRACTICE Continuity of care generates a bespoke medical service
    Gray, Denis Pereira
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [5] CONTINUITY OF CARE IN GENERAL PRACTICE Good continuity of care requires slack in the system
    Hunt, Cain R.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
  • [6] Continuity of care in general practice: the Norwegian experience
    Sandvik, Hogne
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
  • [7] What future for continuity of care in general practice?
    Freeman, G
    Hjortdahl, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7098): : 1870 - 1873
  • [8] The nature of informational continuity of care in general practice
    Agarwal, Gina
    Crooks, Valorie A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2008, 58 (556): : 784 - 789
  • [9] Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice?
    Freeman, GK
    Olesen, F
    Hjortdahl, P
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2003, 20 (06) : 623 - 627
  • [10] Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views
    Schers, H
    Webster, S
    van den Hoogen, H
    Avery, A
    Grol, R
    van den Bosch, W
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2002, 52 (479): : 459 - 462