When and why do cuteness cues intensify the power of message framing in promoting pro-environmental behaviors?

被引:1
|
作者
Lei, Miki I. T. [1 ]
Huang, Huiling [1 ]
Yang, Fiona X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macau, Dept Integrated Resort & Tourism Management, E22-3033 Ave Univ, Taipa 999078, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Pro-environmental behaviors; Message framing; Cuteness cues; Feeling right; Experimental design; REGULATORY FOCUS; CONSTRUAL LEVEL; FEELS RIGHT; FIT; CONSUMERS; CONSERVATION; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTION; PERSUASION; MATTERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103894
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Gain and loss message framing has been utilized to encourage consumers' pro-environmental behaviors in the hospitality and tourism industries. However, little is known about when and why presenting different types of cuteness cues influences the relative effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages, despite the commonness of cuteness cues in the service environment. To address this gap, this research examines the interaction effects between message framing (gain vs. loss) and cuteness type (kindchenschema vs. whimsical) on consumers' pro-environmental responses. Through three cross-cultural studies using the experimental design approach, our results show that when kindchenschema cuteness cues are present, loss-framed (vs. gain-framed) messages generate more favorable pro-environmental responses. In contrast, gain-framed (vs. loss-framed) messages are more effective when whimsical cuteness cues are present. Moreover, results from the mediation analyses revealed that the sense of feeling right is the underlying mechanism explaining these effects. These findings provide critical implications for theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Message framing strategies in promoting tourists' pro-environmental behavioral intentions: the interaction of social distance and message framing
    Zhao, Xinxin
    Yao, Yanbo
    Ren, Lianping
    Jia, Guangmei
    JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2023, 40 (08) : 678 - 692
  • [2] The Power of Internal Communication for Environmental Sustainability in Promoting Employee's Pro-Environmental Behaviors
    Lee, Yeunjae
    Dong, Enzhu
    Sun, Ruoyu
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH, 2025, 37 (1-2) : 173 - 188
  • [3] Gains and losses for humans and the environment: Effects of social identity and message prospect framing on pro-environmental behaviors
    Dedman, Riley
    Lee, Eunro
    ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, : 393 - 417
  • [4] Effective Pro-environmental Communication: Message Framing and Context Congruency Effect
    Song, Jiehang
    Lin, Zhibin
    Zheng, Chundong
    JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH, 2025, 64 (01) : 206 - 221
  • [5] Why Do Employees Show Pro-Environmental Behaviors? A Perspective of Environment Social Responsibility
    Lee, Shih-Chin
    Huang, Stanley Y. B.
    Hu, Ling
    Chang, Tai-Wei
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (06)
  • [6] Roles of Environmental Knowledge in Promoting Agricultural Students' Pro-Environmental Behaviors
    Nahavandian, F.
    Naeimi, A.
    Ranjbar, B.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 24 (05): : 1057 - 1071
  • [7] Individual responses to climate change: Framing effects on pro-environmental behaviors
    Sapiains, Rodolfo
    Beeton, Robert J. S.
    Walker, Iain A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 46 (08) : 483 - 493
  • [8] The effect of message framing on pro-environmental behavior intentions An information processing view
    Chang, Meng-Chen
    Wu, Chao-Chan
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2015, 117 (01): : 339 - 357
  • [9] Intergenerational transmission of pro-environmental behaviors: do grandparents' environmental behaviors influence grandchildren?
    Marrese, Tiana
    Greenspan, Itay
    Katz-Gerro, Tally
    Handy, Femida
    SOCIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM, 2024, 44 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [10] Complementary Versus Competitive Framing Effects in the Context of Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors
    Detenber, Benjamin H.
    Ho, Shirley S.
    Ong, Adeline H.
    Lim, Nigel W. B.
    SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2018, 40 (02) : 173 - 198