Adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in older adults following colorectal resection

被引:0
|
作者
Cathomas, Marionna [1 ]
Taha, Anas [1 ]
Kunst, Nicole [1 ]
Burri, Emanuel [2 ]
Vetter, Marcus [3 ]
Galli, Raffaele [1 ]
Rosenberg, Robert [1 ]
Heigl, Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp Baselland, Dept Surg, CH-4410 Liestal, Switzerland
[2] Med Univ Clin, Cantonal Hosp Baselland, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Liestal, Switzerland
[3] Cantonal Hosp Baselland, Dept Oncol & Hematol, Liestal, Switzerland
关键词
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); Colorectal surgery; Older patients; CANCER RESECTION; RECTAL-CANCER; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; OUTCOMES; PROTOCOL; FRAILTY; PATHWAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102062
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an established pathway to improve short-term outcomes in colorectal surgery. It is unclear whether the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of the ERAS protocol are similar in older and younger patients. The study examined adherence to the ERAS protocol and identified factors leading to deviations in older patients. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing colorectal resection were prospectively included in the ERAS protocol between 2019 and 2022. The cohort was stratified according to age and ERAS adherence score. The patients were compared regarding clinical short-term follow-up (30 days). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the statistical program R (version 4.1.2). Results: During the study period, 414 patients were recruited, including 132 patients (31.9 %) aged >= 75 years. The cohort of older adults showed significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores III/IV (57.8 % vs. 81.8 %; p < 0.001) and more frequently malignant diseases (45.9 % vs. 64.1 %; p < 0.001), but a lower body mass index (26.7 vs. 24.4; p < 0.001). Furthermore, older adults achieved significantly lower adherence to the ERAS protocol in the postoperative phase (84.6 % vs. 80.1 %; p = 0.003) and experienced a longer median length of hospital stay (6 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). The differences identified were increased change of body weight on postoperative day 1, delayed removal of a urinary catheter, and shorter duration of mobilization on postoperative days 2 and 3 (p < 0.05). However, in the multivariate analysis, emergency and open surgery as well as severe complications, but not age, were elicited as independent predictive factors for lower adherence to the ERAS protocol postoperatively. Discussion: Adherence to the postoperative ERAS requirements appears to be lower in older patients, although age alone was not an independent factor in our multivariate analysis and therefore not responsible for a lower adherence to the postoperative ERAS protocol after colorectal resection. This difference underlines the importance of interdisciplinary teamwork in daily practice to achieve optimal postoperative results, especially in older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Audit of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guideline Adherence in Elective Colorectal Surgery
    Mehl, Lyons L.
    Waldron, R.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 : S206 - S206
  • [2] Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Colorectal Surgery Preface
    Kunitake, Hiroko
    [J]. CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2019, 32 (02) : 93 - 93
  • [3] The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection
    Apurva Ashok
    Devayani Niyogi
    Priya Ranganathan
    Sandeep Tandon
    Maheema Bhaskar
    George Karimundackal
    Sabita Jiwnani
    Madhavi Shetmahajan
    C. S. Pramesh
    [J]. Surgery Today, 2020, 50 : 323 - 334
  • [4] The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection
    Ashok, Apurva
    Niyogi, Devayani
    Ranganathan, Priya
    Tandon, Sandeep
    Bhaskar, Maheema
    Karimundackal, George
    Jiwnani, Sabita
    Shetmahajan, Madhavi
    Pramesh, C. S.
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2020, 50 (04) : 323 - 334
  • [5] A Systematic Review of Smartphone Applications for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Following Colorectal Surgery
    Aseem, R.
    Cribb, E.
    Liccardo, F.
    Daulatzai, N.
    Smith, J.
    Pawa, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [6] The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal tumor resection
    Zhang, Chi
    Fang, Ruizhi
    Gu, Bin
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (11) : 2556 - 2557
  • [7] Correction to: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection
    Apurva Ashok
    Devayani Niyogi
    Priya Ranganathan
    Sandeep Tandon
    Maheema Bhaskar
    George Karimundackal
    Sabita Jiwnani
    Madhavi Shetmahajan
    C. S. Pramesh
    [J]. Surgery Today, 2020, 50 : 531 - 531
  • [8] Influence of day of surgery on morbidity after laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)
    Bonne, Aline
    Trilling, Bertrand
    Sage, Pierre-Yves
    Fauconnier, Jerome
    Tidadini, Fatah
    Girard, Edouard
    Foote, Alison
    Faucheron, Jean-Luc
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111 (01)
  • [9] Acute kidney injury following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in colorectal surgery
    Joseph H. Marcotte
    Kinjal Patel
    Ronak Desai
    John P. Gaughan
    Deviney Rattigan
    Kevin W. Cahill
    Robin F. Irons
    Justin Dy
    Monika Dobrowolski
    Helena McElhenney
    Michael Kwiatt
    Steven McClane
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 1259 - 1267
  • [10] Acute kidney injury following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in colorectal surgery
    Marcotte, Joseph H.
    Patel, Kinjal
    Desai, Ronak
    Gaughan, John P.
    Rattigan, Deviney
    Cahill, Kevin W.
    Irons, Robin F.
    Dy, Justin
    Dobrowolski, Monika
    McElhenney, Helena
    Kwiatt, Michael
    McClane, Steven
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (09) : 1259 - 1267