An assessment of the CMIP6 performance in simulating Arctic sea ice volume flux via Fram Strait

被引:0
|
作者
Kuang, Hui-Yan [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Shao-Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Yu-Fang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shao-Yin [1 ,2 ]
Bi, Hai-Bo [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Zhuo-Qi [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Xiao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat sen Univ, Sch Geospatial Engn & Sci, Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat sen Univ, Key Lab Comprehens Observat Polar Environm, Minist Educ, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, CAS Key Lab Marine Geol & Environm, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China
[4] Qingdao Natl Lab Marine Sci & Technol, Lab Marine Geol, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sea ice volume flux; CMIP6; models; Fram Strait; Attribution analysis; SATELLITE; MODEL; EXPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.accre.2024.06.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Numerical models serve as an essential tool to investigate the causes and effects of Arctic sea ice changes. Evaluating the simulation capabilities of the most recent CMIP6 models in sea ice volume flux provides references for model applications and improvements. Meanwhile, reliable longterm simulation results of the ice volume flux contribute to a deeper understanding of the sea ice response to global climate change. In this study, the sea ice volume flux through six Arctic gateways over the past four decades (1979-2014)- 2014) were estimated in combination of satellite observations of sea ice concentration (SIC) and sea ice motion (SIM) as well as the Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) reanalysis sea ice thickness (SIT) data. The simulation capability of 17 CMIP6 historical models for the volume flux through Fram Strait were quantitatively assessed. Sea ice volume flux simulated from the ensemble mean of 17 CMIP6 models demonstrates better performance than that from the individual model, yet IPSL-CM6A-LR and EC-Earth3-Veg-LR outperform the ensemble mean in the annual volume flux, with Taylor scores of 0.86 and 0.50, respectively. CMIP6 models display relatively robust capability in simulating the seasonal variations of volume flux. Among them, CESM2WACCM performs the best, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96 and a Taylor score of 0.88. Conversely, NESM3 demonstrates the largest deviation from the observation/reanalysis data, with the lowest Taylor score of 0.16. The variability of sea ice volume flux is primarily influenced by SIM and SIT, followed by SIC. The extreme large sea ice export through Fram Strait is linked to the occurrence of anomalously low air temperatures, which in turn promote increased SIC and SIT in the corresponding region. Moreover, the intensified activity of Arctic cyclones and Arctic dipole anomaly could boost the southward sea ice velocity through Fram Strait, which further enhance the sea ice outflow.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 595
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Deep Arctic Ocean and Fram Strait in CMIP6 Models
    Heuze, Celine
    Zanowski, Hannah
    Karam, Salar
    Muilwijk, Morven
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2023, 36 (08) : 2551 - 2584
  • [2] Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6
    Notz, Dirk
    Doerr, Jakob
    Bailey, David A.
    Blockley, Ed
    Bushuk, Mitchell
    Debernard, Jens Boldingh
    Dekker, Evelien
    DeRepentigny, Patricia
    Docquier, David
    Fuckar, Neven S.
    Fyfe, John C.
    Jahn, Alexandra
    Holland, Marika
    Hunke, Elizabeth
    Iovino, Doroteaciro
    Khosravi, Narges
    Madec, Gurvan
    Massonnet, Francois
    O'Farrell, Siobhan
    Petty, Alek
    Rana, Arun
    Roach, Lettie
    Rosenblum, Erica
    Rousset, Clement
    Semmler, Tido
    Stroeve, Julienne
    Toyoda, Takahiro
    Tremblay, Bruno
    Tsujino, Hiroyuki
    Vancoppenolle, Martin
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (10)
  • [3] Assessment of the Seasonal and Multiyear Variability in the Sea Ice Volume Export via the Fram Strait
    Egorova, Elizaveta S.
    Mironov, Yevgeny U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING, 2023, 33 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [4] Multi-Aspect Assessment of CMIP6 Models for Arctic Sea Ice Simulation
    Long, Mengyuan
    Zhang, Lujun
    Hu, Siyu
    Qian, Shimeng
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (04) : 1515 - 1529
  • [5] Variability in categories of Arctic sea ice in Fram Strait
    Hansen, E.
    Ekeberg, O. -C.
    Gerland, S.
    Pavlova, O.
    Spreen, G.
    Tschudi, M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2014, 119 (10) : 7175 - 7189
  • [6] Arctic Sea Ice Volume Export Through Fram Strait From 1992 to 2014
    Spreen, Gunnar
    de Steur, Laura
    Divine, Dmitry
    Gerland, Sebastian
    Hansen, Edmond
    Kwok, Ronald
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2020, 125 (06)
  • [7] Assessment of Arctic sea ice and surface climate conditions in nine CMIP6 climate models
    Henke, Martin
    Cassalho, Felicio
    Miesse, Tyler
    Ferreira, Celso M.
    Zhang, Jinlun
    Ravens, Thomas M.
    ARCTIC ANTARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH, 2023, 55 (01)
  • [8] Assessment and Ranking of Climate Models in Arctic Sea Ice Cover Simulation: From CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Shen, Zili
    Duan, Anmin
    Li, Dongliang
    Li, Jinxiao
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (09) : 3609 - 3627
  • [9] Evaluation of Arctic sea ice simulation of CMIP6 models from China
    LI Jiaqi
    WANG Xiaochun
    WANG Ziqi
    ZHAO Liqing
    WANG Jin
    Advances in Polar Science, 2022, 33 (03) : 220 - 234
  • [10] The Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Change in CMIP6’s Historical Simulations
    Lanying Chen
    Renhao Wu
    Qi Shu
    Chao Min
    Qinghua Yang
    Bo Han
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2023, 40 : 2331 - 2343