Antecedents of Customer Participation on Sharing Platforms: A Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Blut, Markus [1 ]
Wang, Cheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Durham Univ Business Sch, Durham Univ, Riverside Pl, Durham DH1 1SL, England
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Int Business Sch, 718 East Haizhou Rd, Haining 314400, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
COLLABORATIVE CONSUMPTION; SERVICE QUALITY; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS; FASHION CONSUMPTION; UNIFIED THEORY; CO-CREATION; ECONOMY; TRUST; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8551.12871
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given the substantive influence of the digital revolution on the sharing economy, it is timely and relevant to ask why some sharing platforms (e.g. Airbnb and Uber) achieve significant success while others fail. To determine which factors encourage customers to participate in sharing goods and services on sharing platforms, and when they do so, this study conducts a meta-analysis of empirical findings from 192 independent samples, extracted from 167 studies involving 171,344 customers. As the results clarify, customer-related factors (customer motives, customer competence, customer satisfaction and subjective norms) are key antecedents. However, platform-related factors (service quality of the platform, trust in the platform, performance expectancy and effort expectancy) and service-provider-related factors (service quality of the provider, trust in the provider and provider gender) also exert meaningful effects. To assess the generalizability of these antecedents, the meta-analysis includes contextual moderators, namely customer type (previous provider experience), provider type (private/professional supply), platform characteristics (rivalry on the platform, prestige of ownership and services/goods) and exchange type (for-profit/non-profit and ownership transfer). The findings advance the literature on the sharing economy and provide specific guidance for platform managers about when to focus on certain antecedents.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Customer participation in service recovery: a meta-analysis
    Van Vaerenbergh, Yves
    Hazee, Simon
    Costers, Annelies
    MARKETING LETTERS, 2018, 29 (04) : 465 - 483
  • [2] Customer participation in service recovery: a meta-analysis
    Yves Van Vaerenbergh
    Simon Hazée
    Annelies Costers
    Marketing Letters, 2018, 29 : 465 - 483
  • [3] A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in the sharing economy
    Jiang, Jiang
    Li, Eldon Y.
    Tang, Li
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 34 (06) : 2257 - 2297
  • [4] Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: a meta-analysis and critique
    Witherspoon, Candace L.
    Bergner, Jason
    Cockrell, Cam
    Stone, Dan N.
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 17 (02) : 250 - 277
  • [5] Antecedents of proactive customer service performance in hospitality: a meta-analysis
    Yan, Zhen
    Dato Mansor, Zuraina
    Choo, Wei Chong
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MARKETING & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 32 (04) : 505 - 529
  • [6] Antecedents of customer brand advocacy: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence
    Bhati, Ragini
    Verma, Harsh V.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN INTERACTIVE MARKETING, 2020, 14 (02) : 153 - 172
  • [7] The Effectiveness of Customer Participation in New Product Development: A Meta-Analysis
    Chang, Woojung
    Taylor, Steven A.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2016, 80 (01) : 47 - 64
  • [8] A meta-analysis of the relationship between customer participation and brand outcomes
    Machado Nardi, Vinicius Antonio
    Jardim, William Carvalho
    Ladeira, Wagner Junior
    Santini, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 117 : 450 - 460
  • [9] A contingency model of union commitment and participation: Meta-analysis of the antecedents of militant and nonmilitant activities
    Monnot, Matthew J.
    Wagner, Stephen
    Beehr, Terry A.
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2011, 32 (08) : 1127 - 1146
  • [10] A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents of Career Commitment
    Zhu, Dan
    Kim, Peter Beomcheol
    Milne, Simon
    Park, In-Jo
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2021, 29 (03) : 502 - 524