Cost-effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Aided Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection in Colon Cancer Screening

被引:8
|
作者
Barkun, Alan N. [1 ,2 ]
von Renteln, Daniel [3 ,4 ]
Sadri, Hamid [5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Clin Epidemiol, 1650 Cedar Ave,D7 346, Montreal, PQ H3G1A4, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal Hosp Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Medtron Canada, Dept Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Brampton, ON, Canada
关键词
Adenoma detection; Artificial-intelligence; CADe; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/jcag/gwad014
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims Artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy significantly improves adenoma detection. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the GI Genius technology, an artificial intelligence-aided computer diagnosis for polyp detection (CADe), in improving colorectal cancer outcomes, adopting a Canadian health care perspective.Methods A Markov model with 1-year cycles and a lifetime horizon was used to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing CADe to conventional colonoscopy polyp detection amongst patients with a positive faecal immunochemical test. Outcomes were life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. The analysis applied costs associated with health care resource utilization, including procedures and follow-ups, from a provincial payer's perspective using 2022 Canadian dollars. Effectiveness and cost data were sourced from the literature and publicly available databases. Extensive probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed, assessing model robustness.Results Life years and QALY gains for the CADe and conventional colonoscopy groups were 19.144 versus 19.125 and 17.137 versus 17.113, respectively. CADe and conventional colonoscopies' overall per-case costs were $2990.74 and $3004.59, respectively. With a willingness-to-pay pre-set at $50,000/QALY, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was dominant for both outcomes, showing that CADe colonoscopy is cost-effective. Deterministic sensitivity analysis confirmed that the model was sensitive to the incidence risk ratio of adenoma per colonoscopy for large adenomas. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the CADe strategy was cost-effective in up to 73.4% of scenarios.Conclusion The addition of CADe solution to colonoscopy is a dominant, cost-effective strategy when used in faecal immunochemical test-positive patients in a Canadian health care setting. The use of computers in medicine is growing. Studies showed that computers increase the chance of finding cancer in colonoscopy. But the equipment is more expensive. We assessed the cost of using a computer for a colonoscopy. We showed that it is less costly and more successful than colonoscopy alone. We showed that using the computer for colonoscopy lowers the cost of Canada' Health care.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 105
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR SCREENING COLONOSCOPY
    Mori, Yuichi
    Areia, Miguel
    Correale, Loredana
    Repici, Alessandro
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Sharma, Prateek
    Taveira, Filipe
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Ebigbo, Alanna
    Kudo, Shinei
    Arribas, Julia
    Barua, Ishita
    Kaminski, Michael
    Messmann, Helmut
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario J.
    Hassan, Cesare
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB137 - AB137
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-aided Glaucoma Screening in Hong Kong: A Markov Model
    Ran, Anran
    Chan, Poemen Pui Man
    Tham, Clement C.
    Cheung, Carol Yim-lui
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [3] Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy on the adenoma detection rate: A systematic review
    Mwango, Anson
    Akhtar, Tayyab Saeed
    Abbas, Sameen
    Abbasi, Dua Sadaf
    Khan, Amjad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION, 2024, 13 (03): : 65 - 73
  • [4] How does artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy help to improve adenoma detection rates?
    Lim, Wei Shyann
    Liew, Jacqueline Jin Li
    Loh, Caitlin Yuen Ling
    Teoh, Seth En
    Koh, Frederick Hong-Xiang
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (12) : 3130 - 3131
  • [5] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELIGENCE-AIDED COLONOSCOPY FOR ADENOMA DETECTION IN COLORECTAL CANCER - A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE
    Barkun, Alan N.
    Sadri, Hamid
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB263 - AB264
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence-Aided Colonoscopy Does Not Increase Adenoma Detection Rate in Routine Clinical Practice
    Levy, Idan
    Bruckmayer, Liora
    Klang, Eyal
    Ben-Horin, Shomron
    Kopylov, Uri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (11): : 1871 - 1873
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study
    Areia, Miguel
    Mori, Yuichi
    Correale, Loredana
    Repici, Alessandro
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Sharma, Prateek
    Taveira, Filipe
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Ebigbo, Alanna
    Kudo, Shin-Ei
    Arribas, Julia
    Barua, Ishita
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Messmann, Helmut
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Hassan, Cesare
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4 (06): : E436 - E444
  • [8] Artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy in 10 years
    Mohan, Babu P.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (03) : 452 - 453
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence-Aided Endoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Massimi, Davide
    Mori, Yuichi
    Alfarone, Ludovico
    Fugazza, Alessandro
    Maselli, Roberta
    Sharma, Prateek
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Hassan, Cesare
    Repici, Alessandro
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (06)
  • [10] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy according to the adenoma detection rate
    Hassan, Cesare
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Zullo, Angelo
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 3 (02) : 200 - 207