Field Redevelopment and Weight Shedding for Decommissioning of Offshore Facilities

被引:1
|
作者
Reda, Ahmed [1 ]
Amaechi, Chiemela Victor [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shahin, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Mckee, Kristoffer K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Civil & Mech Engn, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
[2] Univ Lancaster, Sch Engn, Lancaster LA1 4YR, England
[3] Global Banking Sch, Dept Construct Management, Manchester M12 6JH, England
[4] Natl Energy Univ, Inst Energy Infrastruct, Kajang 43009, Malaysia
关键词
subsea pipelines; oil and gas platforms; decommissioning; redevelopment; offshore facilities; weight shedding; load shedding; OIL; ABANDONMENT; PIPELINES; ISSUES; REEFS;
D O I
10.3390/jmse12081331
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
There is currently a rising interest in reusing and repurposing offshore facilities through decommissioning; however, major challenges arise, such as size, weight, sea depth, planned use, and location. This article aims to discuss the philosophy that needs to be adopted for field redevelopment, particularly when existing platforms must be preserved and integrated into new greenfield facilities. The article also discusses the concept of weight shedding during the decommissioning of offshore facilities to either extend the life of existing platforms or provide clear space for new equipment to be installed by removing unnecessary components and structures. The above aspects of decommissioning are investigated through the redevelopment of a case study of a mature offshore oil field located in shallow water. The study indicated that weight shedding presents a favourable method for decommissioning offshore installations and can effectively lower expenses, minimise environmental consequences, and optimise the use of resources.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health and safety aspects of decommissioning offshore facilities
    Lunt, M
    NUCLEAR DECOM 2001: ENSURING SAFE, SECURE, AND SUCCESSFUL DECOMMISSIONING, 2001, 2001 (08): : 183 - 194
  • [2] The technical analysis and study of decommissioning and abandonment of offshore oil field surface facilities and subsea system
    Lu Guihua
    Li Hongsheng
    Xiao Jianjun
    Li Zhihao
    Xu Minhang
    OCEAN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2016, 6 (03): : 289 - 303
  • [3] Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas facilities: A comparative assessment of different scenarios
    Ekins, Paul
    Vanner, Robin
    Firebrace, James
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (04) : 420 - 438
  • [4] Decommissioning offshore oil and gas facilities in China: Process and environmental impacts
    Chen, Dongxing
    Chen, Lianghong
    Zhang, Yafeng
    Wang, Xutao
    Wang, Jinming
    Wen, Ping
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 296
  • [5] DOMINO EFFECT RISK ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS FACILITIES DECOMMISSIONING
    Li, Yihong
    Hu, Zhiqiang
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2022, VOL 1, 2022,
  • [6] Decommissioning of radiochemical facilities
    Rovnyi, SI
    Arsent'eva, NV
    Emel'yanov, NM
    Kolesnikov, VN
    ATOMIC ENERGY, 2001, 90 (02) : 165 - 168
  • [7] Decommissioning of offshore installations
    Mankabady, S
    JOURNAL OF MARITIME LAW AND COMMERCE, 1997, 28 (04): : 603 - 615
  • [8] Ecological and political issues surrounding decommissioning of offshore oil facilities in the Southern California Bight
    Schroeder, DM
    Love, MS
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (1-2) : 21 - 48
  • [9] Decommissioning of Radiochemical Facilities
    S. I. Rovnyi
    N. V. Arsent'eva
    N. M. Emel'yanov
    V. N. Kolesnikov
    Atomic Energy, 2001, 90 : 165 - 168
  • [10] Decommissioning of nuclear facilities
    Warnecke, E
    Weil, L
    KERNTECHNIK, 2005, 70 (1-2) : 8 - 8