Addressing Endogeneity in Meta-Analysis: Instrumental Variable Based Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Ke, Zijun [1 ]
Zhang, Yucheng [2 ]
Hou, Zhongwei [3 ]
Zyphur, Michael J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Southampton, Southampton, England
[3] Northwest Normal Univ, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Queensland, Queensland, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
endogeneity in meta-analysis; instrumental variable; correlational effect sizes; EFFECT SIZE HETEROGENEITY; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; MODERATING ROLE; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONS; SATISFACTION; ANTECEDENTS; SIMULATION; TURNOVER;
D O I
10.1177/01492063241263331
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In management research, meta-analysis is often used to aggregate findings from observational studies that lack random assignment to predictors (e.g., surveys), which may pose challenges in making accurate inferences due to the correlational nature of effect sizes. To improve inferential accuracy, we show how instrumental variable (IV) methods can be integrated into meta-analysis to help researchers obtain unbiased estimates. Our IV-based meta-analytic structural equation modeling (IV-MASEM) method relies on the fact that IVs can be incorporated into SEM, and meta-analytic effect sizes from correlational research can be used for MASEM. Conveniently, IV-MASEM does not require that each primary study measures all relevant variables, and it can address typical types of endogeneity, such as omitted variable bias. We clarify how the principles of IV-SEM can be applied to MASEM and then conduct three simulations to study the validity of IV-MASEM versus Univariate Meta-Analyses (UMA) and MASEMs that exclude IVs when the instruments were appropriate, inappropriate, and missing from a subset of primary studies. We also offer an illustrative study to demonstrate how to apply IV-MASEM to address endogeneity concerns in meta-analysis, which includes a new R function to test the qualifying conditions for IVs. We conclude with limitations and future directions for IV-MASEM.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PREDICTORS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN CANCER SURVIVORS: META-ANALYSIS AND META-ANALYTIC STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING OF STUDIES
    Hirshey, Rachel
    Bryant, Ashley L.
    Macek, Catherine
    Battaglini, Claudio
    Santacroce, Shelia
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    Walker, Jennifer
    Avishai, Aya
    Sheeran, Pachal
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 : S636 - S636
  • [2] An Evaluation of Methods for Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling
    Lee, Kejin
    Beretvas, S. Natasha
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (05) : 703 - 715
  • [3] Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling With Fallible Measurements
    Gnambs, Timo
    Sengewald, Marie-Ann
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 231 (01): : 39 - 52
  • [4] Reinforcement sensitivity, depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation model
    Katz, Benjamin A.
    Matanky, Kathryn
    Aviram, Gidi
    Yovel, Iftah
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 77
  • [5] A Primer on Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling: the Case of Depression
    Valentine, Jeffrey C.
    Cheung, Mike W-L
    Smith, Eric J.
    Alexander, Olivia
    Hatton, Jessica M.
    Hong, Ryan Y.
    Huckaby, Lucas T.
    Patton, Samantha C.
    Possel, Patrick
    Seely, Hayley D.
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2022, 23 (03) : 346 - 365
  • [6] Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling
    Oort, Frans J.
    Jak, Suzanne
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2016, 7 (02) : 156 - 167
  • [7] A Tutorial on the Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling of Reliability Coefficients
    Scherer, Ronny
    Teo, Timothy
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 25 (06) : 747 - 775
  • [8] A Primer on Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling: the Case of Depression
    Jeffrey C. Valentine
    Mike W.-L. Cheung
    Eric J. Smith
    Olivia Alexander
    Jessica M. Hatton
    Ryan Y. Hong
    Lucas T. Huckaby
    Samantha C. Patton
    Patrick Pössel
    Hayley D. Seely
    [J]. Prevention Science, 2022, 23 : 346 - 365
  • [9] An Evaluation of Multiple Imputation for Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling
    Furlow, Carolyn F.
    Beretvas, S. Natasha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN APPLIED STATISTICAL METHODS, 2010, 9 (01) : 129 - 143
  • [10] Testing moderator hypotheses in meta-analytic structural equation modeling using subgroup analysis
    Jak, Suzanne
    Cheung, Mike W-L.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (04) : 1359 - 1373