Impact of Osteoporosis on Short-Term Surgical Outcomes in Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients Undergoing Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Hiyama, Akihiko [1 ]
Sakai, Daisuke [1 ]
Katoh, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Sato, Masato [1 ]
Watanabe, Masahiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokai Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
Cage subsidence; Endplate injury; - Japanese orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire surgical outcomes; Osteoporosis; Lateral lumbar fusion; Lumbar degenerative disease; PAIN EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE; CAGE SUBSIDENCE; SURGERY; NAVIGATION; POSITION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.130
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
- OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study assesses the influence of osteoporosis on the short-term clinical outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs), focusing on complications, pain intensity, and quality of life (QOL) improvements. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the impact of osteoporosis on the short-term clinical outcomes following LLIF surgery in LDD patients, with a particular focus on the incidence of cage subsidence (CS) and overall patient well-being postoperatively.- METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 73 patients who underwent LLIF for LDD. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on osteoporosis status determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans: those with osteoporosis (n = 20) and those without osteoporosis (n = 53). Data collection included demographics, surgical details, complications, magnetic resonance imaging analysis, pain intensity, and QOL (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire).- RESULTS: The groups had no significant differences regarding operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay duration. However, the incidence of CS was 40% in patients with osteoporosis, compared to 17% innonosteoporotic patients. Despite this, significant improvements in spinal canal dimensions were observed in both groups. Both groups experienced significant reductions in pain intensity, with notable improvements in functional outcomes assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, indicating the overall effectiveness of LLIF in enhancing patient well-being and functionality, irrespective of osteoporosis status.- CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis increases the risk of CS in LLIF surgery for LDD patients but does not affect short-term pain relief and QOL improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:E424 / E433
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [2] Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis
    Hui-Min Li
    Ren-Jie Zhang
    Cai-Liang Shen
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20
  • [3] The Impact of Osteoporosis on Adverse Outcomes After Short Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Wolfert, Adam J.
    Rompala, Alexander
    Beyer, George A.
    Shah, Neil, V
    Ikwuazom, Chibuokem P.
    Kim, David
    Shah, Sharan T.
    Passias, Peter G.
    Lafage, Virginie
    Schwab, Frank J.
    Paulino, Carl B.
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (12) : 573 - 579
  • [4] Microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: short-term and medium-term outcomes
    Yang, Yang
    Liu, Bin
    Rong, Li-Min
    Chen, Rui-Qiang
    Dong, Jian-Wen
    Xie, Pei-Gen
    Zhang, Liang-Ming
    Feng, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (11): : 21319 - 21326
  • [5] A Short-Term Assessment of Lumbar Sagittal Alignment Parameters in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Siegel, Nicholas
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Fredericks, Donald J.
    Curran, John
    Safran, Jordan
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Woods, Barrett I.
    Kaye, David
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (23) : 1620 - 1626
  • [6] Lateral-anterior lumbar interbody fusion (LaLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease: Technical notes, surgical system, and mid-term outcomes
    Cui, Jia-Ming
    Wang, Jian-Ru
    Zheng, Zhao-Min
    Liu, Hui
    Wang, Hua
    Li, Ze-Min
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2021, 28 : 12 - 20
  • [7] Is instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease? A meta-analysis
    Yang, Honghao
    Liu, Jingwei
    Hai, Yong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 92 : 136 - 146
  • [8] Short-term outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lytic and degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Ali, Yousuf
    Najmus-Sakeb
    Rahman, Muhibbur
    Mhamud, Salauddin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2012, 20 (03) : 371 - 374
  • [9] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E627 - E638
  • [10] Comparison of prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: A retrospective radiographic propensity score-matched analysis
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Aguirre, Alexander O.
    Ruggiero, Nicco
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Mariotti, Brandon L.
    Khan, Asham
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    Pollina, John
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 213