Carbon dioxide removal and net zero emissions in Africa: an integrated assessment modelling based on three different land-based negative emission solutions

被引:3
|
作者
Ampah, Jeffrey Dankwa [1 ,2 ]
Afrane, Sandylove [3 ]
Adun, Humphrey [4 ]
Dioha, Michael O. [5 ]
Agyekum, Ephraim Bonah [6 ,7 ]
Yusuf, Abdulfatah Abdu [8 ]
Naseer, Mudassar [2 ]
Bamisile, Olusola [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Energy & Nat Resources UENR, Sch Energy, POB 214, Sunyani, Ghana
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Engines, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[4] Near East Univ, Operat Res Ctr Healthcare, Haspolat Lefkosa, Mersin, Turkiye
[5] Clean Air Task Force, Boston, MA 02109 USA
[6] Ural Fed Univ, Dept Nucl & Renewable Energy, 19 Mira St, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia
[7] Western Caspian Univ, 31 Istiglaliyyat St, AZ-1001 Baku, Azerbaijan
[8] Univ Liberia, Dept Mech Engn, Monrovia, Liberia
[9] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Planning, London, England
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2024年 / 19卷 / 08期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
net zero emissions; negative emissions; carbon dioxide removal; BECCS; biochar; integrated assessment modelling; afforestation and reforestation;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dcf
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the remaining carbon budget for limiting warming to 1.5 degrees C rapidly diminishes, it is clear that, besides decarbonization, the world will need to remove 100-1000 GtCO2 from the atmosphere by the end of the century. Yet, Africa, where many carbon removal schemes are planned, remains a 'blindspot' in existing studies. There is limited understanding of the trade-offs and synergies associated with carbon removal within Africa's energy-land-water system. To address this research gap, we model a stylized net-zero emissions (NZEs) in Africa by 2050, with focus on three land-based biological carbon removal approaches: afforestation/reforestation (AR), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and biochar. We find that by 2050, the total gross carbon removal is projected to reach 1.2 GtCO2 yr-1 when all three carbon removal approaches are available, and 0.5 GtCO2 yr-1 when Africa relies solely on AR. Pursuing NZE with only AR or AR alongside biochar in Africa would be the most expensive mitigation option but they lead to the lowest residual fossil fuel and industry CO2 emissions. An NZE by 2050 in Africa could reduce cropland by 30%-40% from 2020 to 2050, depending on the carbon dioxide removal deployment strategy adopted. Southern Africa would be particularly affected, facing significant challenges in balancing food security with climate goals. The highest increase in staple food prices will occur under AR only, while the availability of AR-BECCS-biochar produces the lowest rise in staple food prices. Our findings highlight the need for balanced and region-specific carbon dioxide removal strategies to ensure climate and other sustainability goals are met.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Assessment of land-based negative emissions Options in Thailand
    Suwannakarn, Norawit
    Salam, P. Abdul
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [2] Land-based climate mitigation strategies for achieving net zero emissions in India
    Jaiswal, Deepak
    Siddique, Khadeeja Mol
    Jayalekshmi, T. R.
    Sajitha, A. S.
    Kushwaha, Amit
    Surendran, Sruthi
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2025, 7
  • [3] Negative erosion and negative emissions: Combining multiple land-based carbon dioxide removal techniques to rebuild fertile topsoils and enhance food production
    Janssens, Ivan A.
    Roobroeck, Dries
    Sardans, Jordi
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Penuelas, Josep
    Richter, Andreas
    Smith, Pete
    Verbruggen, Erik
    Vicca, Sara
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2022, 4
  • [4] Mutual reinforcement of land-based carbon dioxide removal and international emissions trading in deep decarbonization scenarios
    Morris, Jennifer
    Gurgel, Angelo
    Mignone, Bryan K.
    Kheshgi, Haroon
    Paltsev, Sergey
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [5] Toward quantification of the feasible potential of land-based carbon dioxide removal
    Perkins, Oliver
    Alexander, Peter
    Arneth, Almut
    Brown, Calum
    Millington, James D. A.
    Rounsevell, Mark
    ONE EARTH, 2023, 6 (12): : 1638 - 1651
  • [6] Understanding land-based carbon dioxide removal in the context of the Rio Conventions
    Dooley, Kate
    Pelz, Setu
    Norton, Alexander
    ONE EARTH, 2024, 7 (09): : 1501 - 1514
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment in the Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification of Land-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal: Gaps and Opportunities
    Yao, Yuan
    Zhang, Bingquan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2025,
  • [8] Land-based implications of early climate actions without global net-negative emissions
    Tomoko Hasegawa
    Shinichiro Fujimori
    Stefan Frank
    Florian Humpenöder
    Christoph Bertram
    Jacques Després
    Laurent Drouet
    Johannes Emmerling
    Mykola Gusti
    Mathijs Harmsen
    Kimon Keramidas
    Yuki Ochi
    Ken Oshiro
    Pedro Rochedo
    Bas van Ruijven
    Anique-Marie Cabardos
    Andre Deppermann
    Florian Fosse
    Petr Havlik
    Volker Krey
    Alexander Popp
    Roberto Schaeffer
    Detlef van Vuuren
    Keywan Riahi
    Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4 : 1052 - 1059
  • [9] Microalgae-based biotechnological sequestration of carbon dioxide for net zero emissions
    Ma, Zengling
    Cheah, Wai Yan
    Ng, I-Son
    Chang, Jo-Shu
    Zhao, Min
    Show, Pau Loke
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 40 (12) : 1439 - 1453
  • [10] Land-based implications of early climate actions without global net-negative emissions
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Frank, Stefan
    Humpenoeder, Florian
    Bertram, Christoph
    Despres, Jacques
    Drouet, Laurent
    Emmerling, Johannes
    Gusti, Mykola
    Harmsen, Mathijs
    Keramidas, Kimon
    Ochi, Yuki
    Oshiro, Ken
    Rochedo, Pedro
    van Ruijven, Bas
    Cabardos, Anique-Marie
    Deppermann, Andre
    Fosse, Florian
    Havlik, Petr
    Krey, Volker
    Popp, Alexander
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    van Vuuren, Detlef
    Riahi, Keywan
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (12) : 1052 - +