Prevalence of antenatal depression and postpartum depression among Chinese fathers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Paternal antenatal depression and postpartum depression are associated with adverse health outcomes in mothers and infants; however, their prevalence among Chinese fathers remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the prevalence of antenatal depression and postpartum depression in Chinese fathers. Methods: We conducted a systematic meta-analysis on the prevalence of antenatal depression and postpartum depression among Chinese fathers by searching 11 databases. Pooled estimates and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated. The choice between a random-effects model and a fixed-effects model was based on an assessment of heterogeneity among the studies as well as assumptions regarding the similarity of the studies in terms of clinical characteristics, quality, design, and conduct. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted based on the scale used to measure antenatal depression and postpartum depression, the region where the study was completed, the time of the study, the study design, the number of children, publication language, the study site, and quality assessment. Results: This meta-analysis included 28 studies with 8795 participants. The prevalence of antenatal depression among Chinese fathers was 11 % (95 % CI: 5%-17 %, P < 0.01) using a random- effects model. Heterogeneity was I-2 = 91 %. Publication language moderated the prevalence of paternal antenatal depression (the amount of heterogeneity accounted for was 92.13 %). The prevalence of postpartum depression among Chinese fathers was 16 % (95 % CI: 13%-18 %, P < 0.01), using a random-effects model. The heterogeneity was I-2 = 94 %. The prevalence of paternal postpartum depression was moderated by the scale used to measure postpartum depression (39.17 % heterogeneity) and the region where the study was completed (33.15 % heterogeneity). Moreover, Egger's test (t = 4.542, P < 0.001) indicated publication bias in studies on postpartum depression among Chinese fathers. However, after applying the trimming correction, the pooled prevalence of postpartum depression had a P value of <0.05, indicating that despite the publication bias, the results remain reliable and unaffected in terms of effect size. Conclusion: The prevalence of antenatal depression and postpartum depression among Chinese fathers was similar to those reported in low- and middle-income countries. Fathers should receive regular screening, effective prevention, and appropriate treatment. However, interpreting these results requires consideration of the limitations of the study.