The Role of Scenario-Building in Risk Assessment and Decision-Making on Urban Water Reuse

被引:0
|
作者
Ribeiro, Rita [1 ]
Rosa, Maria Joao [1 ]
机构
[1] LNEC Natl Lab Civil Engn, Hydraul & Environm Dept, Urban Water Unit, Ave Brasil 101, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
decision-making; communication; non-potable water reuse; risk assessment; risk management; risk perception; urban resilience;
D O I
10.3390/w16182674
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban resilience and water resilience are both increasingly relying on urban non-potable water reuse under the context of the Climate Emergency, but sound risk assessment is lacking. Compared to the state of art, the proposed framework for health risk assessment and management of urban non-potable water reuse includes (i) an additional step for establishing the context and (ii) the risk identification step being extended to introduce a description of the activities from which the hazard exposure scenarios may be built. This novel scenario-building process allows for a clear and comprehensive risk description, assessment, and treatment. The model of risk management is structured around three primary components: the decision-makers, i.e., the municipal services and the population at risk (users and workers); data elements relevant for the risk management process (reclaimed water quality, hazards, hazardous events, sites where exposure can happen, exposure routes, and activities developed by the population at risk and their vulnerabilities); and the links between the decision-makers and these elements and between the elements themselves. Its application in a representative case study shows that the framework comprehensively guides decision-making and communication to relevant stakeholders. From this practical exercise, the main recommendations were derived for risk mitigation by the municipal risk manager and the park users.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selection of the Best Water Supply Scenario for Urban Demand Based on the Risk Analysis in Decision-Making Model
    Sabbaghian, Reza Javidi
    Nejadhashemi, Amir Pouyan
    [J]. NEW TRENDS IN URBAN DRAINAGE MODELLING, UDM 2018, 2019, : 942 - 947
  • [2] THE ROLE OF HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN REGULATORY DECISION-MAKING
    SCROGGIN, DG
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 194 : 26 - CHAL
  • [3] Role of risk assessment in environmental security planning and decision-making
    Wenning, R. J.
    Della Sala, S.
    Magar, V.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY IN HARBORS AND COASTAL AREAS: MANAGEMENT USING COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2007, : 329 - +
  • [4] The shortfall of risk assessment for decision-making
    Hjorth, Rune
    [J]. NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 12 (12) : 1109 - 1110
  • [5] RISK ASSESSMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION-MAKING
    STRAF, ML
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1982, 36 (03): : 222 - 224
  • [6] DECISION-MAKING AND PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    BARI, RA
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1986, 93 (2-3) : 341 - 348
  • [7] The shortfall of risk assessment for decision-making
    Rune Hjorth
    [J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2017, 12 : 1109 - 1110
  • [8] Risk assessment and clinical decision-making
    Roaldset, John Olav
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 49 (01): : 90 - 90
  • [9] RISK ASSESSMENT AND REGULATORY DECISION-MAKING
    MUNRO, IC
    KREWSKI, DR
    [J]. FOOD AND COSMETICS TOXICOLOGY, 1981, 19 (05): : 549 - 560
  • [10] Dynamic human error risk assessment of group decision-making in extreme cooperative scenario
    Qiao, Yidan
    Gao, Xinwei
    Ma, Lin
    Chen, Dengkai
    [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2024, 249