Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Masses With Solid Components: Diagnostic Performance of CEUS Combined With IOTA Simple Rules and O-RADS

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Beilei [1 ,3 ,4 ]
He, Wanyuan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Chang [2 ]
Wang, Pan [1 ]
Yang, Ping [1 ]
Zhao, Zhengyong [1 ,5 ]
Qi, Jiuling [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Huang, Beijian [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Ultrasound Res & Educ Inst, Dept Med Ultrasound,Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Inst Med Imaging, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Inst Med Ultrasound & Engn, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[5] Third Peoples Hosp Honghe Hani & Yi Autonomous Pre, Gejiu, Yunnan, Peoples R China
来源
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2024年 / 50卷 / 09期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ovary; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis; Simple rules; Ovarian-Adnexal reporting and data system; Contrast score; ULTRASOUND FEATURES; ADNEXAL CYSTS; TUMORS; CANCER; BORDERLINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.05.024
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to apply the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules (SR), the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in an identical cohort of Chinese patients and to analyze their performance in discrimination of ovarian masses with solid components. Methods: This was a two-center retrospective study that included a total of 94 ovarian lesions in 86 women enrolled from January 2018 to February 2023. The lesions were classified by using the IOTA terminology and CEUS was performed for the lesions exhibiting solid components on ultrasonography, IOTA SR and O-RADS were applied, and CEUS images were analyzed retrospectively. We assessed the time to wash-in, time to peak intensity (PI), PI compared to myometrium, and time to wash-out, and observed statistically significant differences between benign and malignant lesions in the first three parameters. CEUS characteristics were employed to determine CEUS scores for benign (score 0) and malignant (score 3) lesions. Subsequently, the lesions were reassessed based on the IOTA SR and O-RADS classifications and CEUS scores. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of the different models were also determined. Results: Among the 94 ovarian lesions, 46 (48.9%) were benign and 48 (51.1%) were malignant. It was found that in the 60 lesions to which the SR could be applied, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC was 0.900, 0.667, and 0.783, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of O-RADS was observed to be 1.000, 0.283 and 0.641, respectively. When SR and O-RADS were combined with CEUS, their sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were increased to 0.917, 0.891, 0.904, and 0.958, 0.783, 0.871, respectively. Conclusion: IOTA SR and O-RADS exhibited relatively low specificity in differentiating malignant from benign ovarian lesions with the solid components, and their diagnostic performance can be significantly improved when combined with CEUS.
引用
收藏
页码:1449 / 1458
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses
    Wen ting Xie
    Yao qin Wang
    Zhi sheng Xiang
    Zhong shi Du
    Shi xin Huang
    Yi jie Chen
    Li na Tang
    [J]. Journal of Ovarian Research, 15
  • [2] Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses
    Xie, Wen Ting
    Wang, Yao Qin
    Xiang, Zhi Sheng
    Du, Zhong Shi
    Huang, Shi Xin
    Chen, Yi Jie
    Tang, Li Na
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [3] Performance of O-RADS MRI Score in Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Teratomas: MR Feature Analysis for Differentiating O-RADS 4 From O-RADS 2
    Petrocelli, Robert
    Doshi, Ankur
    Slywotzky, Chrystia
    Savino, Marissa
    Melamud, Kira
    Tong, Angela
    Hindman, Nicole
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2024, 48 (05) : 749 - 758
  • [4] Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women
    Hiett, A. K.
    Sonek, J. D.
    Guy, M.
    Reid, T. J.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (05) : 668 - 676
  • [5] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, IOTA simple rules and O-RADS for assessing the malignant risk of sonographically appearing solid ovarian masses
    Lu, Beilei
    Liu, Chang
    Qi, Jiuling
    He, Wanyuan
    Shi, Tingyan
    Zhu, Yuli
    Huang, Beijian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (04)
  • [6] IOTA Simple Rules in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors
    Tantipalakorn, Charuwan
    Wanapirak, Chanane
    Khunamornpong, Surapan
    Sukpan, Kornkanok
    Tongsong, Theera
    [J]. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (13) : 5123 - 5126
  • [7] Diagnostic added-value of CA125 on O-RADS and Simple Rules in discrimination benign and malignant adnexal masses
    Gong, L.
    Sun, L.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 311 - 311
  • [8] Comparison of Gi-Rads Ultrasonographic Stratification and IOTA Simple Rules in Distinguishing Benign Ovarian Masses from Malignant Ones
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhao, Hao
    Kong, Xiao
    Gao, Yan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 8 (05): : 75 - 82
  • [9] Diagnostic performance of IOTA SR and O-RADS combined with CA125, HE4, and risk of malignancy algorithm to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses
    Yang, Yang
    Ju, Hao
    Huang, Ying
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 165
  • [10] The Value of IOTA Simple Rules Combined With CEUS Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Its Correlation With MVD and VEGF A Preliminary Study
    Liu, Chun
    Li, Yuan
    Zhu, Yi
    Lu, Man
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (12) : 2983 - 2992