Efficacy of ALK inhibitors in Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xuchang [1 ]
Xia, Yangchen [1 ]
Wang, Chengyan [1 ]
Huang, Shanshan [1 ]
Chu, Qian [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Oncol, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); targeted therapy; network meta-analysis (NMA); EML4-ALK FUSION GENE; REAL-WORLD DATA; NSCLC PATIENTS; J-ALEX; CRIZOTINIB; ALECTINIB; PHASE-3;
D O I
10.21037/tlcr-24-604
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: A previous network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the efficacy of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The phase III INSPIRE study of iruplinalkib was published recently. The present study aimed to add the results related to iruplinalkib to the NMA. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google, and Baidu. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), or disease control rate (DCR) results of Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-na & iuml;ve advanced ALK-positive NSCLC were eligible for inclusion in the NMA. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Bayesian fixed-effect models were used for the direct and indirect pairwise comparisons. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024555299). Results: Eight studies, involving 1,477 Asian patients and seven treatments (crizotinib, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, envonalkib, iruplinalkib, and lorlatinib), were included in the NMA. In terms of the overall risks of bias, all of the studies had "some concerns". All the next-generation ALK inhibitors were statistically superior to crizotinib in terms of PFS. Iruplinalkib had the best surface under the cumulative ranking curve (74.0%), followed by brigatinib (69.1%) and ensartinib (63.7%). Most of the pairwise comparisons did not reveal significant differences in the ORR and DCR. In terms of both the ORR and DCR, alectinib ranked first, followed by lorlatinib. Conclusions: Next-generation ALK inhibitors had better efficacy than crizotinib in the treatment of Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-na & iuml;ve advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Iruplinalkib may have more favorable PFS benefit than other ALK inhibitors for Asians.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy and safety of ALK inhibitors in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis
    Fan, Junsheng
    Fong, Tszhei
    Xia, Zengfei
    Zhang, Jian
    Luo, Peng
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (10): : 4993 - 5005
  • [2] A Bayesian network meta-analysis of ALK inhibitor treatments in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer
    Zheng, Bei
    Jiang, Hong
    Yang, Wenjuan
    Li, Ying
    Liang, Bingqing
    Zhu, Jun
    Chen, Nanmei
    Chen, Miao
    Zhang, Meiling
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (15): : 15983 - 15997
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of ALK Inhibitors in ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Breadner, D.
    Shanmuganatjan, S.
    Boldt, G.
    Blanchette, P.
    Raphael, J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (10) : S1034 - S1034
  • [4] Systematic review of sequencing of ALK inhibitors in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer
    Barrows, Stephanie M.
    Wright, Kelly
    Copley-Merriman, Catherine
    Kaye, James A.
    Chioda, Marc
    Wiltshire, Robin
    Torgersen, Knut Martin
    Masters, Elizabeth T.
    LUNG CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2019, 10 : 11 - 20
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Breadner, Daniel
    Blanchette, Phillip
    Shanmuganathan, Sumugan
    Boldt, Ronald Gabriel
    Raphael, Jacques
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 144 : 57 - 63
  • [6] ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Elliott, Jesse
    Bai, Zemin
    Hsieh, Shu-Ching
    Kelly, Shannon E.
    Chen, Li
    Skidmore, Becky
    Yousef, Said
    Zheng, Carine
    Stewart, David J.
    Wells, George A.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of brigatinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xing, Puyuan
    Hao, Xuezhi
    Zhang, Xin
    Li, Junling
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [8] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BRIGATINIB IN ALK-POSITIVE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER TREATMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Li, J.
    Xing, P.
    Hao, X.
    Zhang, X.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S318 - S318
  • [9] Comparative Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors for Treatment-Naive ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastasis: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Ando, Koichi
    Manabe, Ryo
    Kishino, Yasunari
    Kusumoto, Sojiro
    Yamaoka, Toshimitsu
    Tanaka, Akihiko
    Ohmori, Tohru
    Sagara, Hironori
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (03)
  • [10] Brigatinib: A Review in ALK-Inhibitor Naïve Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC
    Sheridan M. Hoy
    Drugs, 2021, 81 : 267 - 275