Automatic Indoor-Outdoor Detection Using Signals of Opportunity

被引:0
|
作者
Sanz, Joshua [1 ]
Abedi, Ali [1 ]
Sahai, Anant [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, EECS, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/DySPAN60163.2024.10632851
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
As spectrum sharing becomes increasingly common in bands such as TV whitespace, CBRS, and 6 GHz Wi-Fi, the community is constantly searching for more opportunities where sharing is possible without causing harmful interference. The distinction between indoor and outdoor use has begun to be used, with the underlying idea that indoor use is far less likely to cause harmful interference to an outdoor receiver. Currently, transmitters self-report their location as indoor or outdoor, which is used to determine allowable transmission powers. But how can we reliably check indoor-vs-outdoor automatically? The very crowded nature of radio spectrum that drives the need for spectrum sharing also means that there exist "signals of opportunity" which can be used to sense the radio environment in an approach that we dub "ReciProxy-ADSB." Aircraft safety broadcasts are a pervasive and useful signal which can provide a radio with directional information about its environment which in turn can produce a more nuanced view of its environment relative to others. We recorded aircraft broadcasts in indoor and outdoor environments then applied model-based and ML-based techniques to classify them. Our preliminary processing shows that with a false positive rate of 30%, we can detect if a station is outdoor with 100% accuracy. Investigating these false positive cases reveals that in most of these indoor scenarios, there is a nearby window that likely creates a signal propagation environment resembling being outdoors. This important finding should motivate the research community to investigate if the today's indoor-outdoor classification methodology for interference prevention is effective in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 516
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Position Estimation in Mixed Indoor-Outdoor Environment Using Signals of Opportunity and Deep Learning Approach
    Urwan, Sebastian
    Wysocka, Dominika R.
    Pietrzak, Alicja
    Cwalina, Krzysztof K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 68 (03) : 594 - 607
  • [2] Indoor-Outdoor Detection Using a Smart Phone Sensor
    Wang, Weiping
    Chang, Qiang
    Li, Qun
    Shi, Zesen
    Chen, Wei
    [J]. SENSORS, 2016, 16 (10)
  • [3] SCULPTURE INDOOR-OUTDOOR
    CULBERTSON, J
    [J]. ARTS MAGAZINE, 1975, 50 (01): : 23 - 24
  • [4] Indoor-Outdoor Detection in Mobile Networks Using Quantum Machine Learning Approaches
    Phillipson, Frank
    Wezeman, Robert S.
    Chiscop, Irina
    [J]. COMPUTERS, 2021, 10 (06)
  • [5] Indoor-Outdoor Detection using Time Series Classification and User Behavioral Cognition
    Hamideche, Sid Ali
    Morel, Marie Line Alberi
    Singh, Kamal
    Viho, Cesar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 14TH IFIP WIRELESS AND MOBILE NETWORKING CONFERENCE (WMNC 2022), 2022, : 7 - 14
  • [6] Indoor-outdoor image classification
    Szummer, M
    Picard, RW
    [J]. 1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CONTENT-BASED ACCESS OF IMAGE AND VIDEO DATABASE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 42 - 51
  • [7] The indoor-outdoor radio environment
    Saunders, SR
    Kelly, K
    Jones, SMR
    Dell'Anna, M
    Harrold, TJ
    [J]. ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2000, 12 (06): : 249 - 261
  • [8] Clustering Wi-Fi fingerprints for indoor-outdoor detection
    Shtar, Guy
    Shapira, Bracha
    Rokach, Lior
    [J]. WIRELESS NETWORKS, 2019, 25 (03) : 1341 - 1359
  • [9] DECT coverage of indoor-outdoor environments
    Phongphanphanee, C
    Mitchell, T
    Steele, R
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 1999, 3 (06) : 161 - 163
  • [10] Indoor-Outdoor Air Pollution Continuum and CVD Burden An Opportunity for Improving Global Health
    Rajagopalan, Sanjay
    Brook, Robert D.
    [J]. GLOBAL HEART, 2012, 7 (03) : 207 - 213