Repeatability of Subjective Refraction in Different Age Groups

被引:0
|
作者
Carpena-Torres, Carlos [1 ]
Batres, Laura [1 ]
Serramito, Maria [1 ]
Carracedo, Gonzalo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Opt & Optometry, Dept Optometry & Vis, Ocupharm Res Grp, C Arcos Jalon 118, Madrid 28037, Spain
关键词
repeatability; subjective refraction; age; myopia; hyperopia; astigmatism; PRECISION;
D O I
10.3390/photonics11070634
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-examiner repeatability of subjective refraction across diverse age cohorts, an aspect not previously investigated. Methods: A cross-sectional, randomized study enrolled 86 participants (mean age: 37.0 +/- 18.0 years), distributed into three groups: youth, non-presbyopic adults, and presbyopic adults. Each participant underwent three subjective refractions by three different optometrists on separate days. Repeatability analysis encompassed all refractive variables (M, J0, and J45). Results: There were no significant differences between optometrists in all refractive variables for either the overall sample or across age groups (p >= 0.05). Additionally, no correlation was found between participants' age and the mean difference in refractive variables across optometrists (p >= 0.05). The 95% confidence interval of repeatability (r) for the total sample was +/- 0.70 D for M, +/- 0.29 for J0, and +/- 0.21 D for J45. Conclusions: Based on these findings and previous research, it is suggested to establish 95% limits of agreement of +/- 0.75 D for M, and between +/- 0.25 D and +/- 0.50 D for both J0 and J45 when validating new refraction systems compared to subjective refraction as the gold standard, regardless of the age of the subjects evaluated.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REPEATABILITY OF SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE REFRACTION
    ROSENFIELD, M
    CHIU, NN
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1995, 72 (08) : 577 - 579
  • [2] Repeatability and Reproducibility of Virtual Subjective Refraction
    Perches, Sara
    Collados, M. Victoria
    Ares, Jorge
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2016, 93 (10) : 1243 - 1253
  • [3] Efficacy and repeatability of aberrometry-based binocular refraction compared with subjective refraction.
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Batres, Laura
    Serramito, Maria
    Gonzalez, Anahi
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [4] Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects: results of vector analysis
    Raasch, TW
    Schechtman, KB
    Davis, LJ
    Zadnik, K
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2001, 21 (05) : 376 - 383
  • [5] Repeatability and Validity of Peripheral Refraction with Two Different Autorefractors
    Morrison, Ann M.
    Mutti, Donald O.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2020, 97 (06) : 429 - 439
  • [6] Repeatability of Aberrometry-Based Automated Subjective Refraction in Healthy and Keratoconus Subjects
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    Pastrana, Cristina
    Privado-Aroco, Ana
    Serramito, Maria
    Batres, Laura
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [7] Visual acuity and refraction by age for children of three different ethnic groups in Paraguay
    Carter, Marissa Janine
    Lansingh, Van Charles
    Schacht, Gisela
    del Amo, Miguel Rio
    Scalamogna, Miguel
    France, Thomas Douglas
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2013, 76 (02) : 94 - 97
  • [8] THE STRUCTURE OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING IN DIFFERENT AGE-GROUPS
    HERZOG, AR
    RODGERS, WL
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1981, 36 (04): : 472 - 479
  • [9] RABIN CONE CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST REPEATABILITY IN HEALTHY PATIENTS OF DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS
    Rhoads Avila, Luis Antonio
    Garcia-Santisteban, Rodrigo
    Garcia-Sanchez, Julian
    Gonzalez Salido, Jimena
    del Castillo Marquez, Gustavo
    Rueda Torres, Elizabeth
    Serrano-Aguilar, Jessica
    Salcedo-Villanueva, Guillermo
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [10] Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: A comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and subjective refraction
    Elliott, M
    Simpson, T
    Richter, D
    Fonn, D
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (06) : 434 - 438