Neuromuscular blocking agent drug challenge: a literature review and protocol proposal with biological evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Gouel-Cheron, Aurelie [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Neukirch, Catherine [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Chollet-Martin, Sylvie [4 ,7 ,8 ]
Valent, Arnaud [9 ]
Plaud, Benoit [3 ,9 ,10 ]
Longrois, Dan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Nicaise-Roland, Pascale [4 ,7 ,8 ]
Montravers, Philippe [1 ,3 ]
de Chaisemartin, Luc [2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ Hosp, AP HP, Anaesthesiol & Crit Care Med Dept, DMU PARABOL, ParisParis, France
[2] Pasteur Inst, Antibody Therapy & Pathol, UMR INSERM 1222, Paris, France
[3] Paris Cite Univ, Paris, France
[4] C2A WAO Ctr Excellence Allergy & Asthma, Paris, France
[5] Paris Cite Univ, Bichat Hosp, AP HP, Pulmonol Dept, Paris, France
[6] Univ Paris Cite, Inserm, PHERE, Paris, France
[7] Hop Xavier Bichat, APHP, Autoimmun Hypersensit & Biol, Immunol Dept,DMU BIOGEM, Paris, France
[8] Univ Paris Saclay, Inflammat Microbiome & Immunosurveillance, INSERM, Orsay, France
[9] St Louis Hosp, APHP, Anaesthesiol Crit Care & Burn Unit Dept, DMU PARABOL, Paris, France
[10] Lariboisiere Hosp, INSERM UMR S942, Paris, France
关键词
HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS; BSACI GUIDELINES; PROVOCATION; ANAPHYLAXIS; MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA; FRANCE;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0000000000002033
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDDrug challenge is the gold standard for identifying causative agents of drug allergies. Although clinical guidelines have recently been published, they do not recommend neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) drug challenges. NMBA challenges are rendered difficult by the lack of homogeneity of routine allergy work-ups and the necessity of a specialised setting. Several scenarios support NMBA challenges, such as an ambiguous allergy work-up, a high suspicion of a false-positive skin test or identification of a well tolerated alternative NMBA strategy. Furthermore, routine allergy work-ups may not recognise non-IgE mechanisms, such as IgG or MRGPRX2, whereas drug challenges may reveal them. Finally, if the culprit NMBA is not identified, subsequent anaesthesia regimens will be challenging to implement, resulting in increased risk.OBJECTIVE(S)This literature review discusses the indications, strategies, doses, monitoring methods, limitations, and unresolved issues related to drug challenges for NMBAs.DESIGNThe literature review included randomised controlled trials, observational studies, reviews, case reports, series, and comments on humans.DATA SOURCESStudies were retrieved from databases (PubMed) and electronic libraries (OVID, EMBASE, Scopus, etc.).ELIGIBILITY CRITERIAAll studies that referred to the NMBA challenge were included without publication date limitations.RESULTSNMBA challenge may be considered in NMBA anaphylaxis patients with inconclusive or ambivalent IgE diagnostic work-up under controlled conditions (presence of anaesthetists and allergists with continuous monitoring in a secured environment). To illustrate its utility, a case report of a double NMBA challenge in a patient with NMBA cross-reactivity is presented, along with biological explorations to detect subclinical cellular activation, a novel aspect of this procedure.CONCLUSIONDrug challenges could be implemented during the NMBA allergy work-up under strict safety conditions at specialised centres with close collaboration between anaesthetists and allergists. This could decrease uncertainty and contribute to defining a safer strategy for subsequent anaesthetic drug regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 727
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drug challenge testing: a critical step in the investigation of neuromuscular blocking agent hypersensitivity
    Littlejohns, Anna
    Hopkins, Philip M.
    Savic, Sinisa
    Mistry, Anoop
    Savic, Louise
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 134 (03) : 641 - 645
  • [2] Evaluation of cisatracurium, a new neuromuscular blocking agent, for tracheal intubation
    Bluestein, LS
    Stinson, LW
    Lennon, RL
    Quessy, SN
    Wilson, RM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1996, 43 (09): : 925 - 931
  • [3] EVALUATION OF A NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENT ORDER SET IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Tasaka, Chelsea
    Gross, Kendall
    Thompson, Ashley
    Homer, Deanna
    Burg, Cindy
    Turnbull, John
    Aldrich, Matthew
    Li, Fanny
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)
  • [4] Status epilepticus in pregnancy: a literature review and a protocol proposal
    Roberti, Roberta
    Rocca, Morena
    Iannone, Luigi Francesco
    Gasparini, Sara
    Pascarella, Angelo
    Neri, Sabrina
    Cianci, Vittoria
    Bilo, Leonilda
    Russo, Emilio
    Quaresima, Paola
    Aguglia, Umberto
    Di Carlo, Costantino
    Ferlazzo, Edoardo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 22 (04) : 301 - 312
  • [5] DEPOLARIZING EFFECT OF ACETYLCHOLINE AND ACTION OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENTS (LITERATURE REVIEW)
    BRISKIN, AI
    FARMAKOLOGIYA I TOKSIKOLOGIYA, 1961, 24 (04): : 499 - &
  • [6] Drug provocation testing (DPT) to exclude neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) allergy: a case report
    Savic, Louise
    Hopkins, Philip
    Ford, Kate
    Arumugakani, Gururaj
    Savic, Sinisa
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2019, 49 (12): : 1664 - 1664
  • [7] Challenge-based Learning A proposal to support the preparation of literature review
    Dutra Moresi, Eduardo Amadeu
    Braga Filho, Mario de Oliveira
    Barbosa, Jair Alves
    Hatmann, Vilson Carlos
    2018 13TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2018,
  • [8] Nursing Considerations When Using Neuromuscular Blocking Agents to Assist With Intubation A Review of Literature
    Blauvelt, Grant
    Burdick, Kailee
    Cannon, Emily J.
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2019, 42 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [9] EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING-AGENTS - INTRODUCTORY REVIEW
    HUGHES, R
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL METHODS, 1984, 12 (01): : 1 - 27
  • [10] Factors influencing the evaluation and management of neuromuscular scoliosis: A review of the literature
    Roberts, Simon B.
    Tsirikos, Athanasios I.
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 29 (04) : 613 - 623