Center of Pressure Velocity and Dynamic Postural Control Strategies Vary During Y-Balance and Star Excursion Balance Testing

被引:0
|
作者
Jagger, Kristen L. [1 ]
Harper, Brent [2 ]
机构
[1] Regis Univ, Sch Phys Therapy, 3333 Regis Blvd,G-4, Denver, CO 80221 USA
[2] Chapman Univ, Phys Therapy, Irvine, CA USA
来源
关键词
postural balance; y-balance test lower quarter; star excursion balance test; ACCELERATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.26603/001c.118943
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background Dynamic postural control (DPC) describes an individual's ability to maintain balance within their base of support in both anticipatory and reactive balance situations and has been measured using center of pressure (COP) velocity. Common standardized DPC assessments for active adults include the modified Star Excursion Balance Test (MSEBT) and the Y-Balance Test (YBT). Hypothesis/Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore DPC during performance of the MSEBT, the YBT, and a modified version of the YBT, the MYBT. It was hypothesized that feedback from the YBT/MYBT reach indicator would enhance DPC. Study Design Cross-sectional study Methods Twenty-one participants (9 females, 12 males, mean age 24.5 +/- 1.2 years) performed three trials in each direction (anterior-AN, posteromedial-PM, and posterolateral-PL) on each balance test during one session. The YBT frame was placed atop a force plate for all testing. Frontal and sagittal plane COP velocities (COPx and COPy, respectively) were recorded throughout each trial and resultant COP (COPr) velocities were calculated. Results Significant main effects were present for test (F=4.485, p<0.001) and reach direction (F=61.594, p<0.001). Post hoc analyses for test indicated significant differences in COPy between YBT and MSEBT (p=0.034) and between MYBT and MSEBT (p<0.001), as well as significant differences in COPr between MYBT and MSEBT (p=0.002). Post hoc analyses for reach direction revealed significant differences in COPx between AN and both PM (p<0.001) and PL (p<0.001) directions, in COPy between AN and PM (p<0.001) and PL (p<0.001) directions, and COPr between AN and PL (p=0.043) directions only. Conclusion External proprioceptive feedback from the reach indicator improved DPC during the YBT and MYBT when compared to the MSEBT. Sagittal plane COP velocities were reduced when external proprioceptive feedback from the reach indicator was present, while frontal plane COP velocities were not affected in this group of participants.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 855
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SCORING PERFORMANCE VARIATIONS BETWEEN THE Y-BALANCE TEST, A MODIFIED Y-BALANCE TEST, AND THE MODIFIED STAR EXCURSION BALANCE TEST
    Jagger, Kristen
    Frazier, Amanda
    Aron, Adrian
    Harper, Brent
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 15 (01): : 34 - 41
  • [2] Comparison of the Y-Balance Test and Star Excursion Balance Test: Utilization of a Discrete Event Simulation
    Gabriel, Emily H.
    Powden, Cameron J.
    Hoch, Matthew C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2021, 30 (02) : 214 - 219
  • [3] Postural Control Strategies are Dependent on Reach Direction in the Star Excursion Balance Test
    Keith, Tyler R.
    Condon, Tara A.
    Phillips, Ayana
    McKeon, Patrick O.
    King, Deborah L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC THERAPY & TRAINING, 2016, 21 (06): : 33 - 39
  • [4] The Accuracy of Ankle Eccentric Torque Control Explains Dynamic Postural Control During the Y-Balance Test
    Nozu, Shojiro
    Johnson, Kristin A.
    Tanaka, Tsukasa
    Inoue, Mika
    Nishio, Hirofumi
    Takazawa, Yuji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 18 (05):
  • [5] Kinematic Analysis of Selected Reach Directions of the Star Excursion Balance Test Compared With the Y-Balance Test
    Fullam, Karl
    Caulfield, Brian
    Coughlan, Garrett F.
    Delahunt, Eamonn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2014, 23 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [6] Investigating the effects of maximal anaerobic fatigue on dynamic postural control using the Y-Balance Test
    Johnston, William
    Dolan, Kara
    Reid, Niamh
    Coughlan, Garrett F.
    Caulfield, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2018, 21 (01) : 103 - 108
  • [7] Performance Differences Between the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test and the Y-Balance Test in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability
    Ko, Jupil
    Wikstrom, Erik
    Li, Yumeng
    Weber, Michelle
    Brown, Cathleen N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2020, 29 (06) : 748 - 753
  • [8] Disrupted somatosensory input alters postural control strategies during the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) in healthy people
    Nozu, Shojiro
    Johnson, Kristin A.
    Takemura, Masahiro
    Shields, Richard K.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2021, 90 : 141 - 147
  • [9] Kinect-based assessment of lower limb kinematics and dynamic postural control during the star excursion balance test
    Eltoukhy, Moataz
    Kuenze, Christopher
    Oh, Jeonghoon
    Wooten, Savannah
    Signorile, Joseph
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2017, 58 : 421 - 427
  • [10] THE MODIFIED STAR EXCURSION BALANCE AND Y-BALANCE TEST RESULTS DIFFER WHEN ASSESSING PHYSICALLY ACTIVE HEALTHY ADOLESCENT FEMALES
    Bulow, A.
    Anderson, J. E.
    Leiter, J. R.
    MacDonald, P. B.
    Peeler, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 14 (02): : 192 - 203